From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 75954 invoked by alias); 4 Nov 2016 22:05:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 75940 invoked by uid 89); 4 Nov 2016 22:05:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 22:05:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: , Subject: tilepro glibc problems Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg00211.txt.bz2 Compile testing of glibc for tilepro (GCC 5, binutils master) shows up two problems: * C++ linking doesn't work (which causes C++ tests in glibc to be disabled): /scratch/jmyers/glibc/many5/install/compilers/tilepro-linux-gnu/lib/gcc/tilepro-glibc-linux-gnu/5.4.1/../../../../tilepro-glibc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: a.out: hidden symbol `__atomic_fetch_add_4' in /scratch/jmyers/glibc/many5/install/compilers/tilepro-linux-gnu/lib/gcc/tilepro-glibc-linux-gnu/5.4.1/libgcc.a(atomic.o) is referenced by DSO /scratch/jmyers/glibc/many5/install/compilers/tilepro-linux-gnu/lib/gcc/tilepro-glibc-linux-gnu/5.4.1/../../../../tilepro-glibc-linux-gnu/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status (This seems to me like your GCC port should be using t-slibgcc-libgcc in libgcc/config.host, but I haven't tested that.) * sys/dataplane.h includes a header asm/dataplane.h and thereby fails the check-installed-headers test because no such header exists in the Linux kernel. How is this meant to work? I imagine this would fail for tilegx as well if that build didn't fail at an earlier stage. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com