public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Fix testsuite build for GCC 7 -Wformat-truncation
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:39:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1701101438470.27549@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)

This patch fixes the glibc testsuite build for GCC 7
-Wformat-truncation, newly moved out of -Wformat-length and with some
further warnings that didn't previously appear.  Two tests that
previously disabled -Wformat-length are changed to disable
-Wformat-truncation instead; two others are made to disable that
option as well.

To fix the build with GCC 7 this goes on top of
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00149.html>,
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00150.html> and
<https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-01/msg00151.html>, which
are all needed to fix the build of glibc itself in particular
configurations (64-bit for the first two, big-endian for the third)
and are all pending review.

Tested (compilation only) with build-many-glibcs.py for aarch64 with
GCC mainline.

2017-01-10  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>

	* stdio-common/tst-printf.c [__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)]: Ignore
	-Wformat-truncation instead of -Wformat-length.
	* time/tst-strptime2.c (mkbuf) [__GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)]: Likewise.
	* stdio-common/tstdiomisc.c (F): Ignore -Wformat-truncation for
	GCC 7.
	* wcsmbs/tst-wcstof.c: Include <libc-internal.h>.
	(do_test): Ignore -Wformat-truncation for GCC 7.

diff --git a/stdio-common/tst-printf.c b/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
index 74150c5..719b3eb 100644
--- a/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
+++ b/stdio-common/tst-printf.c
@@ -33,8 +33,9 @@
 DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (4.9, "-Wformat");
 
 #if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
-/* Compiler warnings about format lengths should also be ignored.  */
-DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-length");
+/* Compiler warnings about snprintf output truncation should also be
+   ignored.  */
+DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-truncation");
 #endif
 
 static void rfg1 (void);
diff --git a/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.c b/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.c
index 5548a71..9c7342d 100644
--- a/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.c
+++ b/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.c
@@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ F (void)
 
   qnanval = NAN;
 
+  /* The %f and %F arguments are in fact constants, but GCC is
+     prevented from seeing this (volatile is used) so it cannot tell
+     that the output is not truncated.  */
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-truncation");
+#endif
+
   snprintf (buf, sizeof buf, "%a %A %e %E %f %F %g %G",
 	    qnanval, qnanval, qnanval, qnanval,
 	    qnanval, qnanval, qnanval, qnanval);
@@ -260,6 +268,8 @@ F (void)
   printf ("expected L\"-inf -INF -inf -INF -inf -INF -inf -INF\", got L\"%S\"\n",
 	  wbuf);
 
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+
   return result;
 }
 
diff --git a/time/tst-strptime2.c b/time/tst-strptime2.c
index 04f7cff..9273568 100644
--- a/time/tst-strptime2.c
+++ b/time/tst-strptime2.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ mkbuf (char *buf, bool neg, bool colon, unsigned int hhmm, size_t ndigits)
      This test is explicitly using short buffers to force snprintf to truncate
      the output so we ignore the warnings.  */
   DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
-  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-length");
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-truncation");
 #endif
   if (colon)
     snprintf (buf + i, ndigits + 2, "%02u:%02u", hh, mm);
diff --git a/wcsmbs/tst-wcstof.c b/wcsmbs/tst-wcstof.c
index 576a58c..861f659 100644
--- a/wcsmbs/tst-wcstof.c
+++ b/wcsmbs/tst-wcstof.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <string.h>
 #include <wctype.h>
+#include <libc-internal.h>
 
 static int
 do_test (void)
@@ -14,7 +15,14 @@ do_test (void)
   tmp[1] = '1';
   tmp[2] = 0;
 
+  /* GCC does not know the result of wcstof so cannot see that the
+     snprintf output is not truncated.  */
+  DIAG_PUSH_NEEDS_COMMENT;
+#if __GNUC_PREREQ (7, 0)
+  DIAG_IGNORE_NEEDS_COMMENT (7.0, "-Wformat-truncation");
+#endif
   snprintf (buf, 100, "%S = %f", tmp, wcstof (tmp, NULL));
+  DIAG_POP_NEEDS_COMMENT;
   printf ("\"%s\" -> %s\n", buf,
 	  strcmp (buf, "81 = 81.000000") == 0 ? "okay" : "buggy");
   result |= strcmp (buf, "81 = 81.000000") != 0;

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

             reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-10 14:39 Joseph Myers [this message]
2017-01-11 14:03 ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1701101438470.27549@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).