From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>, <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
<roland@hack.frob.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Remove vestiges of NaCl port from ARM assembly files.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 14:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1705121403150.13203@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f3bad76-14a6-5d5c-9a3b-e6e94beef5f8@redhat.com>
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 05/12/2017 02:37 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> > This semi-mechanical patch removes all uses and definitions of the
> > sfi_breg, sfi_pld, and sfi_sp macros from various ARM-specific
> > assembly files. These were only used by NaCl. Please read carefully,
> > I don't have any ARM hardware to test this patch on and I may have
> > screwed up my regular expressions.
>
> I did a build on an armv7l-redhat-linux-gnueabihf system, and the libc.so.6
> file had identical disassembly before and after the build, so I assume that
> this is okay.
Yes, it's OK given that testing and the removal of the NaCl port itself.
(There are several other defines in sysdeps/arm/nacl/arm-features.h that
are never defined for non-NaCl, or have constant definitions for non-NaCl
- ARM_ALWAYS_BX, ARM_BX_ALIGN_LOG2, ARM_NO_INDEX_REGISTER - and which
should probably be cleaned up as well eventually in separate patches, but
the sfi_* are by far the most invasive. ARM_ASSUME_NO_IWMMXT is only
defined for NaCl at present, but logically could be defined for all builds
for ARMv6 and later (__ARM_ARCH >= 6, given GCC 4.8 or later or the
__ARM_ARCH emulation in sysdep.h) as iWMMXt is only on certain v5TE
processors. NO_THUMB is more complicated in that only NaCl defines it in
arm-features.h, but some individual .S files define it as well.)
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 0:38 [PATCH 1/2] Remove the bulk of the NaCl port Zack Weinberg
2017-05-12 0:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] Remove vestiges of NaCl port from ARM assembly files Zack Weinberg
2017-05-12 8:22 ` Florian Weimer
2017-05-12 14:09 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2017-05-12 14:30 ` Zack Weinberg
2017-05-20 12:15 ` Zack Weinberg
2017-05-12 15:01 ` Florian Weimer
2017-05-20 21:39 ` Matt Turner
2017-05-22 14:54 ` Joseph Myers
2017-05-12 6:21 ` [PATCH 1/2] Remove the bulk of the NaCl port Florian Weimer
2017-05-27 10:08 ` Rical Jasan
2017-05-27 15:20 ` Zack Weinberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1705121403150.13203@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=roland@hack.frob.com \
--cc=zackw@panix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).