From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4313 invoked by alias); 17 May 2017 10:03:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3667 invoked by uid 89); 17 May 2017 10:03:13 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 10:03:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Rical Jasan CC: , Carlos O'Donell , Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] manual: Fix up invalid header and standards syntax. In-Reply-To: <35402a7f-298f-8392-08e7-f78fa7d9aa95@pacific.net> Message-ID: References: <8c0dcc1290c7f685de0af20655223702ace586b7.1494920105.git.ricaljasan@pacific.net> <35402a7f-298f-8392-08e7-f78fa7d9aa95@pacific.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 On Wed, 17 May 2017, Rical Jasan wrote: > On 05/16/2017 04:51 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 16 May 2017, Rical Jasan wrote: > >> This commit handles exceptional cases of invalid syntax for the > >> @standards conversion script. > >> > >> * manual/crypt.texi: Move a comment out of an @*x list. > >> * manual/filesys.texi: Refactor some comments, one of which > >> looks like a standard. Fix incorrectly separated standards. > >> * manual/locale.texi: Invert an annotation. > >> * manual/resource.texi: Fix incorrectly separated standards. > >> * manual/time.texi: Refactor a @vtable that obscures an > >> annotation. > >> * manual/users.texi: Refactor multiple headers to occupy a > >> single @comment. > > > > OK. > > Should I wait until the rest of the patchset is reviewed to commit this > (and 5/7), or can I push these now? Both 3 & 5 have immediate benefits > independent of the @standards conversion (improved detection by > summary.awk and inclusion in the Variable Index, respectively). An approved patch should be pushed now, assuming it has no dependencies on previous patches that haven't been approved yet. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com