From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67820 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2017 23:22:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 67676 invoked by uid 89); 18 Oct 2017 23:22:28 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=therein, Hx-languages-length:568 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 23:22:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Patrick McGehearty CC: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improves __ieee754_exp() performance by greater than 5x on sparc/x86. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1508172962-97543-1-git-send-email-patrick.mcgehearty@oracle.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00879.txt.bz2 On Wed, 18 Oct 2017, Joseph Myers wrote: > Does this patch remove all calls to __slowexp? If so, I'd expect > slowexp.c to be removed as part of the patch (including > architecture-specific / multiarch variants, and Makefile references to > special options etc. for building slowexp.c). Just to add: one of the less obvious places needing updating on removing slowexp.c is the manual/probes.texi documentation of the probe points therein. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com