From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108546 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2017 17:27:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108526 invoked by uid 89); 29 Nov 2017 17:27:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KB_WAM_FROM_NAME_SINGLEWORD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=states X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 17:27:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Adhemerval Zanella CC: GNU C Library Subject: Re: Possible different binutils version between GCC and GLIBC build In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1c2a3241-e03b-e3e0-d445-40d4f6bd07fc@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.2) X-SW-Source: 2017-11/txt/msg01007.txt.bz2 On Wed, 29 Nov 2017, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > code paths for the loader. It also states about a MIPS bug related to > it, but I couldn't find more information about it. I think it's referring to: https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-03/msg00704.html https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-10/msg00476.html https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-11/msg00008.html (as far as I know the last of those patches still needs review). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com