From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33060 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2018 00:55:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 32822 invoked by uid 89); 23 Jan 2018 00:55:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*patches, organization X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 00:55:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Palmer Dabbelt CC: , Subject: Re: [patches] Re: [PATCH v4 16/17] RISC-V: Build Infastructure In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00731.txt.bz2 On Mon, 22 Jan 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > Yes: the idea here was to reduce the amount of targets that the RISC-V port > needed to support right now. We originally supported all these targets in > glibc so the code is still organized that way. I'd prefer to leave the > organization as it is in case we want to add support for the F ISAs and ABIs, > as I have a feeling we might want to extend this in the future. That's fine (given that the NEWS entry accurately lists what cases are supported, which it appears to - it doesn't mention any cases with "f" but not "d"). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com