From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-91173-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 99885 invoked by alias); 19 Mar 2018 21:31:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 99875 invoked by uid 89); 19 Mar 2018 21:31:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-24.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=died, State
X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 21:31:00 -0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
CC: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, Agustina Arzille <avarzille@riseup.net>
Subject: Re: [hurd,commited] hurd: Reimplement libc locks using mach's
 gsync
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803191644190.4537@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803192130410.19523@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20180318172408.19540-1-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1803191644190.4537@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1) To
 svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1)
X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00480.txt.bz2

On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Joseph Myers wrote:

> > diff --git a/manual/errno.texi b/manual/errno.texi
> > index 73272fd884..8917cccb1e 100644
> > --- a/manual/errno.texi
> > +++ b/manual/errno.texi
> > @@ -882,6 +882,16 @@ the normal result is for the operations affected to complete with this
> >  error; @pxref{Cancel AIO Operations}.
> >  @end deftypevr
> >  
> > +@deftypevr Macro int EOWNERDEAD
> > +@standards{GNU, errno.h}
> > +@errno{EOWNERDEAD, 120, Owner died}
> > +@end deftypevr
> > +
> > +@deftypevr Macro int ENOTRECOVERABLE
> > +@standards{GNU, errno.h}
> > +@errno{ENOTRECOVERABLE, 121, State not recoverable}
> > +@end deftypevr
> 
> In general I'd expect changes to errno.texi to be accompanied by 
> regeneration of sysdeps/gnu/errlist.c.  Does such a regeneration result in 
> no changes to the file, not even to the position in which these errno 
> codes appear therein?

In fact, I'm seeing duplicate entries in sysdeps/gnu/errlist.c created 
after this change.  Maybe these errors need removing from the 
Linux-specific section as well?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com