From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 48611 invoked by alias); 19 Jul 2018 17:03:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 48557 invoked by uid 89); 19 Jul 2018 17:03:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:882 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:03:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Szabolcs Nagy CC: , GNU C Library , Wilco Dijkstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] update libm-test-ulps for new exp In-Reply-To: <62ddbf0a-15be-bafa-6643-70402c872ac2@arm.com> Message-ID: References: <4c570272-db39-aa9d-664b-b6e32402f448@arm.com> <62ddbf0a-15be-bafa-6643-70402c872ac2@arm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2 On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > in the long term i'd prefer if there was a generic ulp error > file and a target could just say it uses the generic bounds That runs into e.g. different long double formats (so you'd need ulps files to specify format names, not "ldouble", which is a good idea anyway, and then you'd need to select appropriate files depending on long double format - and you don't really want to duplicate the sysdeps etc. logic that selects long double formats, but you also have the tables of ulps generated for the manual, which does not depend on the glibc configuration and does not know what configurations use what sysdeps directories, so maybe the tables in the manual would also need rearranging somehow to have generic and architecture-specific ulps). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com