From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54868 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2019 20:53:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54858 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2019 20:53:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:847 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 20:53:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho CC: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC to more fma() tests In-Reply-To: <87zhs14up4.fsf@linux.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20190114200936.21108-1-tuliom@linux.ibm.com> <87zhs14up4.fsf@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00357.txt.bz2 On Tue, 15 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > Joseph Myers writes: > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho wrote: > > > >> Contrary to what I had thought: this is indeed caused by spurious > >> overflows from libgcc (confirmed with the patch applied to libgcc). > >> We can suppress the all errors with XFAIL_ROUNDING_IBM128_LIBGCC. > > > > In that case - if it's only an issue in non-default rounding modes - this > > patch is OK. > > They appear only when rounding upward and downward. > > Pushed as ecdacd34a2ac3b6d5a529ff218b29261d9d98a7a. Will you be closing bug 23584 (given the conclusion it's actually a libgcc issue, addressed via the XFAILing, not a glibc bug)? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com