From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joseph_myers@mentor.com>
Received: from esa1.mentor.iphmx.com (esa1.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.129.153])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 778EE386F439
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:07:10 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 778EE386F439
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=codesourcery.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=joseph_myers@mentor.com
IronPort-SDR: kv+G2eR2EqP726U6DGyfgVBFwnFPpXG9gSLOXhnqFiHPR2HelHSAfQ5he6XStuGD6UkFjeYhGK
 a3vFprQ1VDUCML8kCXnLMrJ5bV9nTeKe3fLMLzu1+Zw33pV+LggY1Qwxs0eKLK2AENxCmYRwvE
 WtRfAiLlLmbCVk3s3WQlQC4WWJoDqPcw8Xq3HS9gg3ZKVlhhHbiX62KTeWVIlwwCaDo+SvTuj/
 IuUGq4wWgM+0NIMrDLYskAy3asbEZQ8sf7rNnfpOUqsks3I/rwGR0iGaqyDrUGpI5SIFF3Qnm/
 92Q=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,276,1589270400"; d="scan'208";a="52304540"
Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167])
 by esa1.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 24 Jun 2020 14:07:08 -0800
IronPort-SDR: v2coZ88nf5loxbkQGHqo5xsiywLLfllX6iNjLeiHyteYP+ZY+cRURGf8q8lR+q41v6c9tLCYLD
 zATwO8h1ZgYd+qIYanzkE7gNduCzVXhLuQMdf/FA/fGJ963RY4Tv6qxiRhrI8etn+GLDtC5te0
 /JeN8bFvxs3+r+4apxt1yxiSiKq+iIbL9ufAXYcRoni3DEmlj44QPmA/obLs8i7XfiS/+Xeoje
 lyqqpQU33SCbgNa8874wQuirEjNxv+eAcLYYRBkvMYPb0X2I2WY3dbuXwCWCudzXr/yojLWwuY
 GDQ=
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:07:04 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
CC: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: V4: [PATCH] x86: Install <sys/platform/x86.h> [BZ #26124]
In-Reply-To: <697cab8a-2d75-ef36-9e09-dbfe6daa4ae1@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006242206380.28946@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20200617193100.1115529-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2006172051530.20587@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <CAMe9rOop09yGx5mWcQwimiCTh=BJL9=xe0mzm8wzMmQDxoc6rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87mu50rccl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOoST0GwLaMVCO4QqYOGxBCQr1JXKZoq=N8Sz0BL33Vk8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87o8pbpiuy.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOoBB4ycG+o6n8cVvZqbMuKo2JxArRykZABk6ZanzzxDrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87ftamg7ez.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOoqU_mLtFUr-_Zb0yAbY_imywAxTLV84FxGaqX5drvk=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87a70ug5v8.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOq_DVfTJ2K3wX-PzF8KzP-BqvcEOKRoopYwLAsknzMtYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOr3XA+XitiA4v=HM_1Stw93sru-=BSZU8mBn2jCi4J=Ow@mail.gmail.com>
 <871rm4bkj6.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
 <697cab8a-2d75-ef36-9e09-dbfe6daa4ae1@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (DEB 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90]
X-ClientProxiedBy: SVR-IES-MBX-08.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.8) To
 SVR-IES-MBX-03.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.3)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3130.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 22:07:12 -0000

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote:

> Should we provide it only for __USE_GNU (_GNU_SOURCE)? And I guess that cpuid
> is not expected to be extendable. The macro API is not my favorite way of 
> doing it, but it looks ok.

The proposed header is glibc-specific.  Having __USE_GNU conditionals in 
such headers is questionable.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com