From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] More Linux syscall refactor
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:38:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011191632370.139939@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f9443e6-84c5-6d0c-0295-08d3308245d7@linaro.org>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> And the idea is not change any current assumption, my goal is just reorganize
> the code.
Then I think the individual patches need longer descriptions that make
this clear - that is, that say explicitly that the change is to the
default, with the final value of the __ASSUME_* macro being unchanged for
all glibc configurations. Because that's not what e.g. "Assume bind
support" suggests to me.
> For getpeername and getsockname is indeed wrong assumption in my
> patch, it should disable both for !__arch64__ && __LINUX_KERNEL_VERSION < 0x040400.
4.20 for those two, I think, because of the compat syscall table.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 19:55 Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 01/28] Remove generic pthread linuxism on POSIX timer_routine Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 02/28] Removed ununsed pthread implementations Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 03/28] Remove local-setxid.h Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 04/28] Remove HAVE_INLINED_SYSCALLS usage on generic implementations Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 05/28] linux: Consolidate and cleanup personality syscall Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/28] x32: Remove syscalls.list Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 07/28] linux: Assume bind support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 08/28] linux: Assume getpeername support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-19 12:55 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 09/28] linux: Assume getsockname support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-19 12:56 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 10/28] linux: Assume getsockopt support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 11/28] linux: Assume listen support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 12/28] linux: Assume setsockopt support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 13/28] linux: Assume shutdown support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 14/28] linux: Assume socket support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 15/28] linux: Assume socketpair support Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 16/28] linux: Remove superflous __ASSUME_CONNECT_SYSCALL definitions Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 17/28] x86_64: Remove ununsed syscalls.list entry Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 18/28] nptl: Add futex_trylock_pi Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 19/28] linux: Add fanotify_mark C implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 20/28] linux: Add prlimit64 " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 21/28] linux: Implement mremap in C Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 22/28] Linux: implement ioctl " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 23/28] mips: Implement n32 lseek64 " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 24/28] x32: Implement " Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 25/28] linux: Implement pipe in terms of __NR_pipe2 Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 26/28] linux: Consolidate brk implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-19 17:31 ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-11-19 17:53 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-19 20:08 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 27/28] linux: Add generic C syscall implementation Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 19:55 ` [PATCH 28/28] alpha: Move implementations to C Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-18 21:06 ` [PATCH 00/28] More Linux syscall refactor Joseph Myers
2020-11-19 12:21 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-11-19 16:38 ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2020-11-19 17:43 ` Adhemerval Zanella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2011191632370.139939@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
--to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).