From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joseph_myers@mentor.com>
Received: from esa3.mentor.iphmx.com (esa3.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.180])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5FA3858D28
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:58:22 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 1D5FA3858D28
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none)
 header.from=codesourcery.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com
IronPort-SDR: wX9+WLdWVK2gofgHQLrTkuQV6HKaaxPDNLP1DV0MhV9WV6xWgi07VZOweRhbnheCiDcK6Ex2Ee
 0/0t4kxW16Kq+asS/aDWp+ogDV9LvTCIcTXTbLx7kUP7WCIQqChSybHKJWVTgdVFdxTiBydwJ6
 LINQ73P2pn47vQyLPyGPAwDIpqjN/UBMWw688suHOHYX/IcIjxorMoQf3EH0AFWw4vtlTteUSz
 9h+lX/YjxBy0Ih6cLUF86sB+7kTqYO6u0FhAlPFWAZCcJ/35s0e91BRsn8ogKK3UHvj1zWX32L
 Y+aZDX3sxh9Pw1ejaINEHKZT
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,278,1635235200"; d="scan'208";a="70468020"
Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165])
 by esa3.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2022 16:58:21 -0800
IronPort-SDR: 7U2x6k6YpHRh0hwOS/NEHQmzw+iLbq+HWwAeTUA5su+T04oGCl2EcgIVKSI8ahu2lbllSoJ9Th
 PsHsqXpJ6cYTePNK2tNLA3HE3+snDFaBxqptYIxFSiq0PdZaXV16cvutcikhAoILp+68K48F1L
 fgb3gSwqFOwoGH38BT0FkER4zwZHMZI73+SkQVe51LWP3OF8kJANk/CKYz80HqtKqLQ1U4ehEK
 G7/m4Bv9wa8lnI8iHhmf2e/lSlrfM4pj9YkCdxNmVkwehxJCsW7ZWWV0AYppEi57fvrl4/aq1F
 RDM=
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:58:16 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
CC: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Why -static-libgcc? (Or: Do we need a build-time libc.so linker
 script?)
In-Reply-To: <87v8yrycco.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2201110057490.444240@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <87y25dmc7k.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2111242307250.1698965@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <87v8yrycco.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90]
X-ClientProxiedBy: SVR-IES-MBX-04.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.4) To
 svr-ies-mbx-01.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.1)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3114.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:58:23 -0000

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:

> Do we really need to support building the test suite against a
> static-only GCC build?

I don't think that's ever worked properly.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com