From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <joseph_myers@mentor.com>
Received: from esa2.mentor.iphmx.com (esa2.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.141.98])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 256A53858407
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:30:27 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 256A53858407
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,313,1654588800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="83004966"
Received: from orw-gwy-01-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.165])
  by esa2.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2022 11:30:25 -0800
IronPort-SDR: A4w7lkMNl+9TBpH1tZTxmHjls1yDmpnLBYw0E9avolPDlTS4xMCYS7nlgHtgVI+zZKo8NYmEit
 CcYvqSt4yIzJ/R9bUXj1U1JQBcOyGyG3kqaFPlJ8s9eKmLOOiZR86TlATWl4qbI8Vo81PKdPxY
 geYj4SFpHmQYI2HkTxwMSRuhFR5wxulXHHRDyeGE/fIhJqiaBnz+K8lyAlTWX3dx+c+jr9XuSW
 WcFs0cMykqawRN6BwQ37CFGsfDREX5K9+dUJU/Q5PoMvH9ne0EWzf7sCsbyw38u5nfqtax/BGW
 q9w=
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2022 19:30:20 +0000
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
X-X-Sender: jsm28@digraph.polyomino.org.uk
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
CC: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Alex Colomar
	<alx.manpages@gmail.com>, <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, JeanHeyd Meneide
	<wg14@soasis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] inttypes.h: imaxabs(3): Implement as a macro
In-Reply-To: <bf465340-41e2-32c3-ba18-8ddb63b468a7@cs.ucla.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2209131929230.3092943@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20220913151853.153311-1-alx.manpages@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2209131820570.3083096@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <bf465340-41e2-32c3-ba18-8ddb63b468a7@cs.ucla.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.22 (DEB 394 2020-01-19)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90]
X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-15.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.15) To
 svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3111.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Tue, 13 Sep 2022, Paul Eggert via Libc-alpha wrote:

> Is it safe to assume that standard types like off_t are no wider than
> intmax_t?

Standard C doesn't discuss off_t at all.  Maybe whatever version of POSIX 
gets based on C2x should address that question.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com