From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 59556 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2018 15:46:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 59539 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jul 2018 15:46:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arm-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ey0I0xfKz43FEOr+hSwjwZ5HtkIxV8pyMDzkJzqgToc=; b=gAj/1wglNMxMCCrF9G7aC9rjRgvqIc9DyFFKmLYtQs3cIy2j/X6Y4vxBrKOyu+AE//kXYLL5j4PDMbXaLa81X1/7Gruh3D+OueRgWGxeysoFlhchkYIofvbtU1C45h2kLALeoyRBzeSXlIUoknO5E0hvDPhsGiTIYMhT8FaUJsc= Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com; Cc: nd@arm.com, Wilco Dijkstra , Joseph Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Optimized math routines To: Carlos O'Donell , GNU C Library References: <50b1b8b6-d03c-224f-31ff-8cf9d8268b6d@redhat.com> From: Szabolcs Nagy Message-ID: Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 15:46:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <50b1b8b6-d03c-224f-31ff-8cf9d8268b6d@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: szabolcs.nagy@arm.com Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: arm.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-SW-Source: 2018-07/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2 On 06/07/18 13:43, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 07/06/2018 04:47 AM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: >> Optimized exp, exp2, log, log2, pow, sinf, cosf and sincosf >> implementations. > > Is it your intent to have these included in 2.28? > (resending as my previous mail seems to be lost) yes, i'd like to add it to the 'desirable in 2.28' list if Joseph is ok with the code, but i see he is not available right now for review. i don't know how other maintainers feel about such change, there needs to be an ulp update (i'm willing to do that for targets i can access hw for testing).