From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Received: from loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE13A3858D37
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 03:00:21 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org AE13A3858D37
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn
Received: from [10.20.4.52] (unknown [10.20.4.52])
	by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8BxXWtDCjVjCpojAA--.5549S2;
	Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:00:19 +0800 (CST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] LoongArch: Add optimized functions.
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>,
 Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
 Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
 "dengjianbo@loongson.cn" <dengjianbo@loongson.cn>
Cc: xuchenghua <xuchenghua@loongson.cn>, "i.swmail" <i.swmail@xen0n.name>,
 libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, joseph <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
 caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
References: <fe6171f8-9fde-b84a-31c8-70bb026252a4@linaro.org>
 <403f78f0-55d9-48cf-c62a-4a0462a76987@loongson.cn>
 <2022091910031722091613@loongson.cn>
 <0172d70e-e939-31d4-bcd8-b47f274f97d9@linaro.org>
 <9cbcd3541c903aaba8038237befee5e3720d144e.camel@xry111.site>
 <1fec4245-9eb4-108d-722e-ba36a1df0023@linaro.org>
 <8411c465e01de9608633f8b1fd2d82d3ef16f001.camel@xry111.site>
 <1679af30-ee17-3016-1bd3-192f744ad8ef@linaro.org>
 <6afb2b9136ff6c96d5b729340427f59e24ebf268.camel@xry111.site>
From: Lulu Cheng <chenglulu@loongson.cn>
Message-ID: <b2df59c2-1ba6-7328-dcda-6dd5db03a6be@loongson.cn>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 11:00:19 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux mips64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6afb2b9136ff6c96d5b729340427f59e24ebf268.camel@xry111.site>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-CM-TRANSID:AQAAf8BxXWtDCjVjCpojAA--.5549S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73
	VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUYV7AC8VAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E
	6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28Cjx
	kF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8I
	cVCY1x0267AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z2
	80aVCY1x0267AKxVWxJr0_GcWle2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IE
	w4CE5I8CrVC2j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMc
	vjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I648v4I1l
	c7I2V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCY02Avz4vE-syl42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4I
	kC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWU
	WwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr
	0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWU
	JVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UYx
	BIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUdHUDUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: xfkh0wpoxo3qxorr0wxvrqhubq/
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

> Added GCC LoongArch port maintainer into Cc:.
>
> It's actually more complicated.  Without the inline assembly in
> repeat_bytes(), the compiler does not hoist the 4-instruction 64-bit
> immediate load sequence out of a loop for "some reason I don't know
> yet".
>
Ok, I understand the problem described, I will debug the problem.