From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D810386197D for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:28:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5D810386197D Received: from mail-oo1-f72.google.com (mail-oo1-f72.google.com [209.85.161.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-184-GZaTn8ExMrKA6eCpp5foUA-1; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:28:55 -0400 X-MC-Unique: GZaTn8ExMrKA6eCpp5foUA-1 Received: by mail-oo1-f72.google.com with SMTP id n19so8953319oof.4 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:28:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6HxnWzU5AuleLJci1yun8Iqrk75w5+5zmG2DeAYSMgw=; b=pi4Eks2+Anr1gGulWx2H6096L+Boe3hmrql3wF446Q1deq6qM9VV0X+bruGAStGwng mRv504c1XiI+DAolPADqDOnQJNueORbcBBaHSWuEJNZ2zjloh8Qh2aT3kGvIhfcSywOf O17iqZK0R8xHDX0DC+5ug2SLT5prMvHdAfIdAIwp8ynxdOrAcNk1S8qKSlC2JZ8Q/LYA nyWmjRlNwbDntSTXTI0qinkeY3mxi08n6RYJvFgPxA0AebVgMlHkjEWBIW9smh5riBz2 cdI6HPgRSM4e6yysbafSF4mLHt31yxV5v5EK9fVwNnVTP6wE8xR8Gv6V/OhGhcIszQX6 RD8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5313wlYxdDYXKfe6M7NN8O7KdifyrL+MZZtiUCqPIo8Fr8rBOiPn NrTej1NC1LPNmXERBpCKWbcRRIdrFs3aqw1rr/aTn6lZdbpDMoR93HHZ6E/mUnMFTV/7xvkZ8rn XhYcSg7LuQzKXRFw8jN3d X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7b48:: with SMTP id f8mr3550995oto.297.1600795734551; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:28:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2L/E7sJhOYSdUUzbn4r/Xg2cNMDVBc/TGLy/DuYpCCxOa8AEqCREpg6ZwfCJhUREgGQfFiA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7b48:: with SMTP id f8mr3550989oto.297.1600795734306; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:28:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (198-84-214-74.cpe.teksavvy.com. [198.84.214.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g23sm7670418oop.46.2020.09.22.10.28.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] implement dlmopen hooks for gdb To: Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha Cc: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" , Pedro Alves , "Jeremy Stenglein (jstengle)" , "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" References: <20200626193228.1953-1-danielwa@cisco.com> <0f791d3a-20bc-4524-54eb-ce6df108fbff@redhat.com> <20200723184054.GD9875@zorba> <3ff42e45-b394-bf50-38c4-93baecc71497@redhat.com> <87h7rpwxke.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:28:46 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h7rpwxke.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 17:29:00 -0000 On 9/22/20 1:06 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: > >> Your next step would be to export the symbol via Versions at the current >> symbol node GLIBC_2.32 (soon to be GLIBC_2.33). > > Can we create a new GLIBC_DEBUG symbol versions for symbols which are > not intended to be used for run-time linking? > > The idea is that consumers will have deal with the absence of these > symbols anyway, so we just need one symbol version that does not depend > on the glibc version for this. Dependency management considerations > (that apply to symbols with run-time linking) do not come into play here. I don't object to GLIBC_DEBUG, like GLIBC_PRIVATE it can be considered a transient ABI that is valid only for a major release? -- Cheers, Carlos.