From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83098385C40E for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:28:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 83098385C40E Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-23-Ez6cEwhQOmqnPyu9lPOSVQ-1; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:28:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Ez6cEwhQOmqnPyu9lPOSVQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id j10-20020ac8440a0000b02902647b518455so3328099qtn.3 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:28:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gvHZ1yYGopnZCu38FezIKlfMD4Ew77AS8BDWsU9RTXY=; b=bt4/a9+JjiX0PbTUu15ulb7c8udGgzCe/4VrRGm9v1bYEttTz6qAYV4vuSKl9ryWXJ Akvx7EO4J0WgDnAf3IBYJb5dteOdW0bLbbKcAqn7n233BLvLrA9aGmTU1zXrkkKC9qZW jz0Ve9GQF4aittUfJ3kzh6BoaSS6+jyI9U4r9JPwL01yvrQfGvf+WEPrCSb8JjIh4ag/ i2kk6IWOG/6V5AmJ2rEfUxhVMG2tno+rvb/WYMmInPALn4Xs4UIP/VcD6jXFYp9lTZjD 1WXPAPZ2Szp73lvoS+9V9H8TJjyF3dOr33ZuBTWkyAIZ9AL08TtfnR7puqF9IGuFsGGF iUJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xrK6WnENokbsRv8CEM+PiDgHzWPBdwTVr/qK6XDj1sxxpNnsr eARiA4ET7Vx+8sqwVLIm66xTZF2rMzNUe7b9UeDh9RFf2rk2w4HHomQ8DlrzO15+06xbsj1NODW 0W2BD6Iu/4EOqKClyRnE/RX2r/vhe4yTAtMmxcdWfMoEptv8WVEbt5iDv1zf6uTf2TRR6WQ== X-Received: by 2002:aed:2149:: with SMTP id 67mr14280957qtc.60.1626956902909; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwXgByYEBIkYvaK0jMzqD2HWO/QEsGTU1CWdAkYWat9wwp6sK7Y9jeTiMsYDAwqHCDjJnHpSw== X-Received: by 2002:aed:2149:: with SMTP id 67mr14280939qtc.60.1626956902697; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (198-84-214-74.cpe.teksavvy.com. [198.84.214.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x125sm12737703qkd.8.2021.07.22.05.28.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Jul 2021 05:28:22 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: glibc 2.34 - Hard ABI freeze effective immediately. To: Florian Weimer , Adhemerval Zanella Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <7dd68a51-0904-98f8-e4ce-3e4bdcb14dc4@redhat.com> <4b8bcc59-362a-21ac-b531-6be07d0c722a@redhat.com> <874kcqxvgs.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87y2a2wf3w.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 08:28:21 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87y2a2wf3w.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:28:26 -0000 On 7/19/21 10:30 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > * Adhemerval Zanella: > >> On 19/07/2021 10:51, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: >>> * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: >>> >>>> On 7/4/21 10:43 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >>>>> We are in slushy freeze right now. I'm reviewing the last of the ABI >>>>> changes we want to make in glibc 2.34. >>>> >>>> The ABI freeze is now hard freeze, I would like to avoid any further ABI >>>> changes that are not on this list. >>>> >>>> If you have an ABI change please reach and respond to this thread >>>> immediately with the request. >>> >>> I suggest to add __ioctl_time64 and related functions on 32-bit, for >>> future-proofing the time64 ABI: >>> >>> Additional time64 aliases >>> >> >> I will review these. > > Thanks. I need to repost it because of several conflicts. This is now complete, we have time64 aliases so this part of the ABI is now frozen. -- Cheers, Carlos.