From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
To: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Cc: John Scott <jscott@posteo.net>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] manual: remove an obsolete requirement on aligned_alloc() usage
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:50:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba8a6ea6-61b2-6bce-d5c3-1a8117c4c755@cs.ucla.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11bc87c2-d59c-0e32-79a4-68bf7d01a2b8@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 962 bytes --]
On 10/25/21 08:45, Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha wrote:
> Based on my code inspection of _mid_memalign in malloc.c I think
> a change that would more accurately reflect the implementation
> is one that described that when alignment is not a power of two
> it's bumped up to next larger power of two, and adjusted
> the EINVAL condition appropriately.
Let's not document this implementation detail, as it might tie us down
unnecessarily in the future.
> I believe the DR460 change went into C17. Here's an early C2x
> draft from 2018 publicly available on the WG14 site that should
> still be very close to C17:
>
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2310.pdf
This says that aligned_alloc "shall fail" if the alignment is not a
valid alignment supported by the implementation. This means the current
glibc alloc_aligned behavior does not conform to C17 and should be fixed
so that it does. Something like the attached (untested) patch, say.
[-- Attachment #2: align.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1155 bytes --]
diff --git a/malloc/malloc.c b/malloc/malloc.c
index 2ba1fee144..386fb5a4cb 100644
--- a/malloc/malloc.c
+++ b/malloc/malloc.c
@@ -3416,6 +3416,12 @@ _mid_memalign (size_t alignment, size_t bytes, void *address)
mstate ar_ptr;
void *p;
+ if (!powerof2 (alignment))
+ {
+ __set_errno (EINVAL);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/* If we need less alignment than we give anyway, just relay to malloc. */
if (alignment <= MALLOC_ALIGNMENT)
return __libc_malloc (bytes);
@@ -3424,24 +3430,6 @@ _mid_memalign (size_t alignment, size_t bytes, void *address)
if (alignment < MINSIZE)
alignment = MINSIZE;
- /* If the alignment is greater than SIZE_MAX / 2 + 1 it cannot be a
- power of 2 and will cause overflow in the check below. */
- if (alignment > SIZE_MAX / 2 + 1)
- {
- __set_errno (EINVAL);
- return 0;
- }
-
-
- /* Make sure alignment is power of 2. */
- if (!powerof2 (alignment))
- {
- size_t a = MALLOC_ALIGNMENT * 2;
- while (a < alignment)
- a <<= 1;
- alignment = a;
- }
-
if (SINGLE_THREAD_P)
{
p = _int_memalign (&main_arena, alignment, bytes);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-26 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-21 9:28 John Scott
2021-10-21 15:41 ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2021-10-25 15:45 ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-25 16:03 ` Martin Sebor
2021-10-26 1:50 ` Paul Eggert [this message]
2021-10-26 2:34 ` Martin Sebor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba8a6ea6-61b2-6bce-d5c3-1a8117c4c755@cs.ucla.edu \
--to=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=jscott@posteo.net \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=msebor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).