From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20471 invoked by alias); 5 Oct 2017 22:20:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20190 invoked by uid 89); 5 Oct 2017 22:20:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:272 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 85B4585376 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=fweimer@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fix double-checked locking in __gconv_get_path and __gconv_read_conf [BZ #22062] To: Carlos O'Donell , Arjun Shankar , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20171002143148.GA41930@aloka.lostca.se> <940c9be0-37ae-ebf7-1013-e6e6a4991028@redhat.com> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 22:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <940c9be0-37ae-ebf7-1013-e6e6a4991028@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-10/txt/msg00305.txt.bz2 On 10/05/2017 10:22 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Is there any reason we need this atomic load? Based on the context, it's not clear to which load you are referring. Florian