From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-89268-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 24154 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2018 22:56:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 24139 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jan 2018 22:56:28 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:D*se
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f170.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:organization
         :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
         :content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=LhhzuGjWT28VOebnLY9rhagDnklRSluRvIdObMfFvzQ=;
        b=OvgW/qdjMT7lC7d8RdESd0p8Bt9T4+QtY4Iqwl4ujMUEqFsImqsHlIw/pceqK/uguW
         c4ohFZniPWjKCdLl4YZpu+RhAczTNa4PV8zSyncULdyLm3AlhP5hTUe1Mx0SpEdUMcNf
         VN5k+F4HtCTWhCO+AJTzy350/N1XYT1nlFlZmnIq3ml0TyRUgzERRCM/6sqJ1d6Z7LlD
         chMEvJESlMUShwjFPBmtUZfjKFVG5tOA8z7wZMypWHbp/8cT72HQl9PNYhCRA1a4qPqh
         +CRjS9dxj4te3TP/xOCEF45pv3qBgck+Ip3J0gWL2WjbeXnEIBX5JNaelNluHV6AiPaG
         e4OA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxyteSZWza+wAJMBqXRYHnsplbmdC/RojWQ+rE7phOwXdy9DY1TU+o
	7JtNwuBodW2/d6JIx+eSFvtSGo/6gdg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBovaOt/cYmAcW54n+FQJa89U/S/82f0hKxCUykdG0r9cUjH5axY4TKwpOJEUCBUrAQnKUS/W0g==
X-Received: by 10.55.197.219 with SMTP id k88mr46852320qkl.9.1516143385479;
        Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix integer overflows in internal memalign and malloc
 functions [BZ #22343]
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Arjun Shankar <arjun.is@lostca.se>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
References: <20180104170250.GA72870@aloka.lostca.se>
 <2933759f-89f6-9a4d-e249-0d740e02c3bc@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <bdddc1f3-1d9a-dd2b-94b6-534dc61f2833@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:56:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2933759f-89f6-9a4d-e249-0d740e02c3bc@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00572.txt.bz2

On 01/16/2018 02:31 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> Please rewrite this as:
> 
> #define foo(...) \
> ({			\
> 	...		\
> })
> 
> The nested braces are less verbose IMHO.

Note that requeset2size (above) can't use nested braces because
it's involved in constant sized array expressions outside
of a normal function.

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.