public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove attribute access from regexec
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 14:08:11 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bebb6028-ddae-67f7-e14c-7f95b733c7cc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4251e9f2-d4d1-b649-8e86-a4336164a5b1@cs.ucla.edu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2497 bytes --]

On 8/13/21 4:34 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 8/13/21 2:30 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> Attached is a revised patch with this approach.
> 
> The revised patch is to include/regex.h but the original patch was to 
> posix/regex.h. Is that intentional?

Yes, they need to be consistent, otherwise GCC issues -Wvla-parameter.
(That's to help detect inadvertent array/VLA mismatches as well as
mismatches in the VLA parameter bounds.)

> 
> We need to check whether __STDC_VERSION__ is defined. Also, no need for 
> parens around arg of 'defined'. Something like this perhaps:
> 
>    #if (defined __STDC_VERSION__ && 199901L <= __STDC_VERSION__ \
>         && !defined __STDC_NO_VLA__)
> 
> Also, the duplication of the declarations make the headers harder to 
> read and encourage typos (I noticed one typo: "_Restrict_arr" without 
> the trailing "_"). Instead, I suggest something like this:
> 
>    #if (defined __STDC_VERSION__ && 199901L <= __STDC_VERSION__ \
>         && !defined __STDC_NO_VLA__)
>    # define _REGEX_VLA(arg) arg
>    #else
>    # define _REGEX_VLA(arg)
>    #endif
> 
> That way, we can simply change "regmatch_t __pmatch[_Restrict_arr_]" to 
> "regmatch_t __pmatch[_Restrict_arr_ _REGEX_VLA (__nmatch)]" without 
> having to duplicate the entire function declaration.

Sounds good.  I've defined the macro in cdefs.h and mamed it _VLA_ARG
to make it usable in other contexts.  Please see the attached revision.

> 
>> PS POSIX says regexec() ignores pnmatch when REG_NOSUB is set, so
>> strictly speaking, warning for such calls to it in that case is
>> also a false positive.
> 
> Ouch, this casts doubt on the entire exercise. It's not simply about 
> warnings: it's about the code being generated for the matcher. For 
> example, for:
> 
> int
> f (_Bool flag, unsigned long n, int a[n])
> {
>    return n == 0 ? 0 : flag ? a[n - 1] : a[0];
> }
> 
> a compiler is allowed to generate code that loads a[n - 1] even when 
> FLAG is false. Similarly, if we add this VLA business to regexec, the 
> generated machine code could dereference pmatch unconditionally even if 
> our source code makes the dereferencing conditional on REG_NOSUB, and 
> the resulting behavior would fail to conform to POSIX.

The VLA bound by itself doesn't affect codegen.  I suspect you're
thinking of a[static n]?  With just a[n], without static, there
is no requirement that a point to an array with n elements.  It
simply declares an ordinary pointer, same as [] or *.

Martin

[-- Attachment #2: glibc-28170.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1835 bytes --]

diff --git a/include/regex.h b/include/regex.h
index 24eca2c297..5cf3ef7636 100644
--- a/include/regex.h
+++ b/include/regex.h
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ extern int __regcomp (regex_t *__preg, const char *__pattern, int __cflags);
 libc_hidden_proto (__regcomp)
 
 extern int __regexec (const regex_t *__preg, const char *__string,
-		      size_t __nmatch, regmatch_t __pmatch[], int __eflags);
+		      size_t __nmatch, regmatch_t __pmatch[_VLA_ARG (__nmatch)],
+		      int __eflags);
 libc_hidden_proto (__regexec)
 
 extern size_t __regerror (int __errcode, const regex_t *__preg,
diff --git a/misc/sys/cdefs.h b/misc/sys/cdefs.h
index e490fc1aeb..6b6e4c233c 100644
--- a/misc/sys/cdefs.h
+++ b/misc/sys/cdefs.h
@@ -632,4 +632,14 @@ _Static_assert (0, "IEEE 128-bits long double requires redirection on this platf
 # define __attribute_returns_twice__ /* Ignore.  */
 #endif
 
+
+#if (defined __STDC_VERSION__ && 199901L <= __STDC_VERSION__	\
+     && !defined __STDC_NO_VLA__)
+/* Used to specify a variable bound in a declaration of a function
+   VLA-like parameter, as in 'int f (int n, int[_VLA_ARG (n)n]);'  */
+# define _VLA_ARG(arg) arg
+#else
+# define _VLA_ARG(arg)
+#endif
+
 #endif	 /* sys/cdefs.h */
diff --git a/posix/regex.h b/posix/regex.h
index 14fb1d8364..52ccc4b577 100644
--- a/posix/regex.h
+++ b/posix/regex.h
@@ -654,9 +654,8 @@ extern int regcomp (regex_t *_Restrict_ __preg,
 
 extern int regexec (const regex_t *_Restrict_ __preg,
 		    const char *_Restrict_ __String, size_t __nmatch,
-		    regmatch_t __pmatch[_Restrict_arr_],
-		    int __eflags)
-    __attr_access ((__write_only__, 4, 3));
+		    regmatch_t __pmatch[_Restrict_arr_ _VLA_ARG (__nmatch)],
+		    int __eflags);
 
 extern size_t regerror (int __errcode, const regex_t *_Restrict_ __preg,
 			char *_Restrict_ __errbuf, size_t __errbuf_size)

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-14 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-13 18:26 Martin Sebor
2021-08-13 20:11 ` Paul Eggert
2021-08-13 21:30   ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-13 22:34     ` Paul Eggert
2021-08-14 20:08       ` Martin Sebor [this message]
2021-08-18 15:53         ` [PATCH v2] " Martin Sebor
2021-08-18 19:52         ` [PATCH] " Paul Eggert
2021-08-19 23:50           ` [PATCH v3] " Martin Sebor
2021-08-22  5:06             ` Paul Eggert
2021-08-26 15:06               ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-26 16:24                 ` Paul Eggert
2021-08-26 16:47                   ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-27  8:52                     ` Paul Eggert
2021-08-27 16:34                       ` Martin Sebor
2021-08-27 17:50                         ` Allow #pragma GCC in headers in conformtest [committed] (was: Re: [PATCH v3] remove attribute access from regexec) Joseph Myers
2021-08-27 18:57                         ` [PATCH v3] remove attribute access from regexec Paul Eggert
2021-09-20 20:46                           ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-21  6:52                             ` Paul Eggert
2021-09-21 13:48                               ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-21 15:00                                 ` Paul Eggert
2021-10-19 16:39             ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-10-19 17:06               ` Martin Sebor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bebb6028-ddae-67f7-e14c-7f95b733c7cc@gmail.com \
    --to=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).