From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362863858D1F for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:00:02 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 362863858D1F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E2D5302FB94; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:59:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2A034000A1F; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:59:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add valgrind smoke test From: Mark Wielaard To: Joseph Myers , alexandra.khirnova@gmail.com Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Alexandra =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E1jkov=E1?= Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:59:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20211206144043.858697-1-ahajkova@redhat.com> <20220112171539.3205267-1-ahajkova@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-8D9m4fLD4Y3uMVL0vvkP" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, GIT_PATCH_0, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:00:04 -0000 --=-8D9m4fLD4Y3uMVL0vvkP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Joseph, On Mon, 2022-01-24 at 18:34 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > I'm seeing >=20 > FAIL: elf/tst-valgrind-smoke >=20 > for the x86_64 configurations when running build-many-glibcs.py (and=20 > UNSUPPORTED for other architectures). No execution tests of the newly= =20 > built glibc should be run at all unless >=20 > ifeq ($(run-built-tests),yes) >=20 > but I don't see any such conditional around the >=20 > tests-special +=3D $(objpfx)tst-valgrind-smoke.out >=20 > that causes this test to be run. If your analysis is correct then the attached patch should solve the issue. Could you try that out? Thanks, Mark --=-8D9m4fLD4Y3uMVL0vvkP Content-Disposition: inline; filename="0001-Guard-tst-valgrind-smoke.out-with-run-built-tests.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="0001-Guard-tst-valgrind-smoke.out-with-run-built-tests.patch"; charset="UTF-8" RnJvbSBjYzQ3OThjMmJmNmFjZmI5ZTU4MGZhYjZlNGJhZDQ2OWY2MDBlMjEyIE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBNYXJrIFdpZWxhYXJkIDxtYXJrQGtsb21wLm9yZz4KRGF0ZTog V2VkLCAyNiBKYW4gMjAyMiAxODo1NzoyOSArMDEwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIEd1YXJkIHRz dC12YWxncmluZC1zbW9rZS5vdXQgd2l0aCBydW4tYnVpbHQtdGVzdHMKClByZXZlbnQgdHN0LXZh bGdyaW5kLXNtb2tlIGZyb20gcnVubmluZyB3aGVuIHJ1bi1idWlsdC10ZXN0cyBpcyBub3QgeWVz LgotLS0KIGVsZi9NYWtlZmlsZSB8IDIgKysKIDEgZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkLCAyIGluc2VydGlvbnMo KykKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9lbGYvTWFrZWZpbGUgYi9lbGYvTWFrZWZpbGUKaW5kZXggZGFhZmI1 Y2YxMi4uNzc1Yzc1NTI5MSAxMDA2NDQKLS0tIGEvZWxmL01ha2VmaWxlCisrKyBiL2VsZi9NYWtl ZmlsZQpAQCAtNTMwLDcgKzUzMCw5IEBAIGVuZGlmCiBlbmRpZgogZW5kaWYKIAoraWZlcSAoJChy dW4tYnVpbHQtdGVzdHMpLHllcykKIHRlc3RzLXNwZWNpYWwgKz0gJChvYmpwZngpdHN0LXZhbGdy aW5kLXNtb2tlLm91dAorZW5kaWYKICQob2JqcGZ4KXRzdC12YWxncmluZC1zbW9rZS5vdXQ6IHRz dC12YWxncmluZC1zbW9rZS5zaCAkKG9ianBmeClsZC5zbyAkKG9ianBmeCl2YWxncmluZC10ZXN0 CiAJJChTSEVMTCkgJDwgJChvYmpwZngpbGQuc28gICQocnRsZGRpcikvJChydGxkLWluc3RhbGxl ZC1uYW1lKSAnJCh0ZXN0LXdyYXBwZXItZW52KScgXAogCQknJChydW4tcHJvZ3JhbS1lbnYpJyAn JChycGF0aC1saW5rKScgJChvYmpwZngpdmFsZ3JpbmQtdGVzdCA+ICRAOyAkKGV2YWx1YXRlLXRl c3QpCi0tIAoyLjM0LjEKCg== --=-8D9m4fLD4Y3uMVL0vvkP--