From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp-19.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.19]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A21D53858C54 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 07:21:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org A21D53858C54 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wanadoo.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wanadoo.fr Received: from [192.168.1.28] ([90.112.30.115]) by smtp.orange.fr with ESMTPA id aX4Cpb5IZ6Nu8aX4CpcuNk; Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:21:29 +0100 X-ME-Helo: [192.168.1.28] X-ME-Auth: cGpmbG95ZEB3YW5hZG9vLmZy X-ME-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:21:29 +0100 X-ME-IP: 90.112.30.115 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 08:21:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0 Subject: Re: Issues in manpage memalign Content-Language: en-GB To: DJ Delorie , Alejandro Colomar Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, linux-man@vger.kernel.org References: From: Paul Floyd In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 10/03/2023 04:02, DJ Delorie wrote: > Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha writes: >> I've CCd glibc, in case someone there can confirm in which direction they >> would like the manual page to go. > see https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20137 > and https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-February/145858.html > > I've got this on my to-do list to fix aligned_alloc to conform to, > probably, C17. I'll send an update for the man page when I update the > code, if you don't do it first ;-) > > I don't know of any discussions to change our stance on memalign() at > this time. Hi Thanks for the links. I don't see any need to change memalign since it's non-standard. Regards Paul