public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [v2, with help] Re: run one test
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:51:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1ddd97e-ea9e-fe6a-27d8-f730b7f8d26e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xnpnjhk13d.fsf@greed.delorie.com>

On 9/30/19 3:58 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com> writes:
>> Bikeshed. Suggest "onecheck" alias given that 'make test' is the same
>> as 'make check.'
> 
> Can add.  I was thinking we already have "make nss/tests" and "make
> tests", we call them "tests" and "testsuite", and "make check" is just a
> convenience target:
> 
>   # Support the GNU standard name for this target.
>   .PHONY: check
>   check: tests
> 
> Or we could call it "make test" (note singular) but I suspect this would
> be confusing, and "make check" (note singular!) vs "make checks".

In summary:

make check = make tests
make onecheck = make test

Or is the tests vs test too confusing?

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-30 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-25 20:41 DJ Delorie
2019-09-25 21:12 ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-09-25 21:18   ` DJ Delorie
2019-09-26  9:10 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2019-09-30 19:37   ` [v2, with help] " DJ Delorie
2019-09-30 19:47     ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-09-30 19:58       ` DJ Delorie
2019-09-30 20:51         ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2019-09-30 20:07       ` [v3, " DJ Delorie
2019-09-30 20:57         ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-10-02 18:44         ` [v4, " DJ Delorie
2019-10-18 19:06           ` Carlos O'Donell
2019-10-18 19:47             ` DJ Delorie
2019-09-30 20:12     ` [v2, " Andreas Schwab
2019-09-30 20:20       ` DJ Delorie
2019-09-30 20:26         ` Andreas Schwab
2019-10-04 12:36     ` Florian Weimer
2019-10-04 17:33       ` DJ Delorie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c1ddd97e-ea9e-fe6a-27d8-f730b7f8d26e@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
    --cc=dj@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).