From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-73025-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 102967 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2016 03:24:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 102915 invoked by uid 89); 1 Sep 2016 03:24:22 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:223
X-HELO: zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: AC_HEADER_MAJOR vs. glibc 2.25(-to-be)
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>, autoconf@gnu.org
References: <CAKCAbMgx-N-w4iuCh3+GkMOup=FQ749vd_qPJ2qyZusaVsnEgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Message-ID: <c29dd41d-69d5-cf56-582e-fb6ae20ed564@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 03:24:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKCAbMgx-N-w4iuCh3+GkMOup=FQ749vd_qPJ2qyZusaVsnEgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2016-09/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2

Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Have I missed either a way to carry out the ideal solution, or a third
> alternative?

How about changing AC_HEADER_MAJOR to detect those warning messages?