From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-90106-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 94340 invoked by alias); 7 Feb 2018 15:07:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 94331 invoked by uid 89); 7 Feb 2018 15:07:08 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_FAIL,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Refactor atfork handlers
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
References: <1518008967-8310-1-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
 <1518008967-8310-3-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <c37a9fdc-08ea-af29-d8aa-2f96339d0df9@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:13:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1518008967-8310-3-git-send-email-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2018-02/txt/msg00252.txt.bz2

On 02/07/2018 02:09 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> +  for (size_t i = 0; i < fork_handler_list_size (&fork_handlers); i++)
> +    if (fork_handler_list_at (&fork_handlers, i)->dso_handle == dso_handle)
> +      {
> +        fork_handler_list_remove (&fork_handlers, i);
> +        break;
> +      }

I think there can be multiple fork handlers for one dso_handle, and this 
loop only removes one of them.

Thanks,
Florian