From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214EC385040B for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:12:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 214EC385040B Received: from mail-qv1-f69.google.com (mail-qv1-f69.google.com [209.85.219.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-463-Z5lcrDEUPg6i91TRHCDzcg-1; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 10:12:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Z5lcrDEUPg6i91TRHCDzcg-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f69.google.com with SMTP id m1so8956675qvp.0 for ; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:12:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QLbVCitNlcZHHRdGHOJB2J1MwYqt1wjPBWnnLgujH/M=; b=cCfcObo+6T1kOVToLAwwWDeGiPglrZ5Ts9h6ZjPHbP7qckkD+yTTfqUY2KhPIttkr0 0ODCongCvHEZi9ytsq8VwCv6n36LvZ18nclP6N3wc0IQIg6U8BOCK0Z7pWWOSyWUUknZ Bp4J3h/tKgrQKIRdSOiB5dSXWKjEVaht4ET1IdzJv3AT0F9g9JUZvENULFoFqDmlCphV fV9DxQUX4EEQVT12NWm2g5M2V4eKsVytEvQxls96fY7Vap+uz4jzgoKXU19hvvJ/Qm+d /11sJXrOlOp/vQPOx5oktOnx23CrkxdPjaqnHiCrT3dpgBCwVV1ibcXsAva37KWUVePW WU3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532gVR+5A2AewjAzhVPf5PX1U3PI+Xcrcyw81fCO0aYaR4TCBLi1 Ore7TPgOC4bDFG8mfneGLeOvHfRXYQ6ldWabaOW68B3+cFQ50Le/l0PS3SGR3TFKe0f1Ql29ThC y0iRm2fAXMltPlsCEsD62iRGQ+SZZvER9mIOi/08YrWPFpoN/ETIqk+dRYHnToMPdYM5WfA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:b8b:: with SMTP id 133mr12894029qkl.427.1612710763397; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:12:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyQak7Z5UFkAScx89BIxftvnxDxJRDjtVx2pnGFMh9KAT4Q4uKwURgCBbPu66AofWsFXEZiZg== X-Received: by 2002:a37:b8b:: with SMTP id 133mr12894015qkl.427.1612710763210; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:12:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (198-84-214-74.cpe.teksavvy.com. [198.84.214.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 196sm14045827qkn.64.2021.02.07.07.12.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Feb 2021 07:12:42 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Proposal for a new Bugzilla category: linux To: Florian Weimer , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <87lfc06me5.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:12:41 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lfc06me5.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:12:47 -0000 On 2/7/21 8:24 AM, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote: > Should we add a new Bugzilla category, linux, for system call wrappers > and other Linux-specific functionality? > > Proposed component description: > > Linux-specific interfaces, such as system call wrappers and ioctl > wrappers, and their implementation. To be clear we would be adding a "component" named "linux" for the glibc product? I'm fine with that. We don't have any OS-specific components like this, but 'libc' is probably the closest component and it's overused as the generic component. -- Cheers, Carlos.