From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp108.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp108.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.108]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220663858407 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:17:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 220663858407 X-Auth-ID: tom@honermann.net Received: by smtp38.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: tom-AT-honermann.net) with ESMTPSA id 7FE873B92; Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:16:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3]: C++20 P0482R6 and C2X N2653: Implement mbrtoc8, c8rtomb, char8_t To: Joseph Myers Cc: libc-alpha References: From: Tom Honermann Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 18:17:58 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Classification-ID: 3be303a2-bc34-49da-adc5-f1a57d0aca1c-1-1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:18:00 -0000 On 1/11/22 2:23 PM, Tom Honermann via Libc-alpha wrote: > On 1/10/22 7:53 PM, Joseph Myers wrote: >> This patch is adding a NEWS entry for 2.34.  Since the next release is >> 2.35, it should add an entry there instead (except we've started release >> slush for 2.35, so it might be better to aim this at 2.36). >> > Thank you for spotting that; this was due to a bad merge conflict > resolution on my part. Fixed patch attached. > > If this needs to wait for 2.36, I understand, but I would love to have > this in 2.35 to close out this gap in C++20 support. Any further comments on this patch series? Tom.