public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/18] RISC-V: nptl: update default pthread-offsets.h
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2020 08:47:15 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c840805a-c39f-d6aa-60bf-f5cebf7861e6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2007082358500.24175@redsun52.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com>



On 08/07/2020 21:14, Maciej W. Rozycki via Libc-alpha wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, Alistair Francis via Libc-alpha wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/sysdeps/riscv/nptl/pthread-offsets.h b/sysdeps/riscv/nptl/pthread-offsets.h
>> index 31f0587bec..a85c752a1f 100644
>> --- a/sysdeps/riscv/nptl/pthread-offsets.h
>> +++ b/sysdeps/riscv/nptl/pthread-offsets.h
>> @@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
>> -#define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_KIND_OFFSET		16
>> +#if __WORDSIZE == 64
>> +# define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_KIND_OFFSET           16
>> +#else
>> +# define __PTHREAD_MUTEX_KIND_OFFSET           12
>> +#endif
> 
>  OK, we have:
> 
> typedef union
> {
>   struct __pthread_mutex_s __data;
>   char __size[__SIZEOF_PTHREAD_MUTEX_T];
>   long int __align;
> } pthread_mutex_t;
> 
> and then:
> 
> struct __pthread_mutex_s
> {
>   int __lock __LOCK_ALIGNMENT;
>   unsigned int __count;
>   int __owner;
> #if __WORDSIZE == 64
>   unsigned int __nusers;
> #endif
>   int __kind;
> #if __WORDSIZE != 64
>   unsigned int __nusers;
> #endif
> 
> which means the `__nusers' and `__kind' members are swapped between 64-bit 
> and 32-bit hosts.  Which I find kind of weird (what for?), but the offset 
> of `__kind' changes accordingly and the values are correct.

The default __pthread_mutex_s was modeled from how other architectures
has done so we use the common ground as default (and avoid having to
create even more arch specific struct_mutex.h).  I don't exactly why
each port has used this specific layout though.

> 
>> -#define __PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FLAGS_OFFSET		48
>> +
>> +#if __WORDSIZE == 64
>> +# define __PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FLAGS_OFFSET		48
>> +#else
>> +# define __PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FLAGS_OFFSET          24
>> +#endif
> 
>  Likewise (as from 09/18):
> 
> typedef union
> {
>   struct __pthread_rwlock_arch_t __data;
>   char __size[__SIZEOF_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_T];
>   long int __align;
> } pthread_rwlock_t;
> 
> and:
> 
> struct __pthread_rwlock_arch_t
> {
>   unsigned int __readers;
>   unsigned int __writers;
>   unsigned int __wrphase_futex;
>   unsigned int __writers_futex;
>   unsigned int __pad3;
>   unsigned int __pad4;
> #if __riscv_xlen == 64
>   int __cur_writer;
>   int __shared;
>   unsigned long int __pad1;
>   unsigned long int __pad2;
>   unsigned int __flags;
> #else
> # if __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
>   unsigned char __pad1;
>   unsigned char __pad2;
>   unsigned char __shared;
>   unsigned char __flags;
> # else
>   unsigned char __flags;
>   unsigned char __shared;
>   unsigned char __pad1;
>   unsigned char __pad2;
> # endif
>   int __cur_writer;
> #endif
> };
> 
> so here we have 48 for RV64, 24 for RV32/LE, and 27 for RV/BE, meaning 
> that your change is wrong.  Please fix that.

This raises a flags because the wrong __PTHREAD_RWLOCK_FLAGS_OFFSET should 
generate a build failure at pthread_rwlock_init.c.

> 
>  Also I think this change makes no sense at this point or indeed on its 
> own as there's been no RV32 support added to <bits/struct_rwlock.h> as at 
> this commit yet, meaning that the offsets would become inconsistent.  
> Please fold it into 09/18.
> 
>   Maciej
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03 16:25 [PATCH v2 00/18] glibc port for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32) Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/18] RISC-V: Use 64-bit time_t and off_t for RV32 and RV64 Alistair Francis
2020-07-07 22:06   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-10 15:27     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/18] RISC-V: Define __NR_* as __NR_*_time64/64 for 32-bit Alistair Francis
2020-07-08  0:09   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-08 17:08     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-07-09 17:14       ` Alistair Francis
2020-07-16  0:23       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-09 17:10     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/18] RISC-V: Add support for 32-bit vDSO calls Alistair Francis
2020-07-08  1:01   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-08 18:17     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/18] RISC-V: Support dynamic loader for the 32-bit Alistair Francis
2020-07-08  1:35   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/18] RISC-V: Add path of library directories " Alistair Francis
2020-07-08 18:42   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-09 17:03     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/18] RISC-V: Add arch-syscall.h for RV32 Alistair Francis
2020-07-08 19:33   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/18] RISC-V: nptl: update default pthread-offsets.h Alistair Francis
2020-07-09  0:14   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-09 11:47     ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2020-07-15 19:23       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-08-10 17:34     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/18] riscv32: Add an architecture ipctypes.h Alistair Francis
2020-07-09  2:46   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-09 11:36     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/18] RISC-V: The ABI implementation for 32-bit Alistair Francis
2020-07-09 23:33   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-10 16:45     ` Alistair Francis
2020-07-11  1:24       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-08-10 21:29         ` Alistair Francis
2020-08-27 19:43           ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-09-25 23:03             ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/18] RISC-V: Hard float support " Alistair Francis
2020-07-11  0:49   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-11 15:49     ` Alistair Francis
2020-07-11 22:13       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-12 15:34         ` Alistair Francis
2020-07-12 22:10           ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-08-27 18:36             ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 11/18] RISC-V: Add ABI lists Alistair Francis
2020-07-12 20:54   ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2020-07-13 16:14     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH v2 12/18] RISC-V: Add the RV32 libm-test-ulps Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 17:34   ` Joseph Myers
2020-06-05  4:01     ` Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 13/18] RISC-V: Fix llrint and llround missing exceptions on RV32 Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 14/18] RISC-V: Build Infastructure for 32-bit Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 15/18] riscv32: Specify the arch_minimum_kernel as 5.4 Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 16/18] RISC-V: Add rv32 path to RTLDLIST in ldd Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 17/18] Documentation for the RISC-V 32-bit port Alistair Francis
2020-06-03 16:26 ` [PATCH v2 18/18] Add RISC-V 32-bit target to build-many-glibcs.py Alistair Francis
2020-06-15 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 00/18] glibc port for 32-bit RISC-V (RV32) Alistair Francis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c840805a-c39f-d6aa-60bf-f5cebf7861e6@linaro.org \
    --to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).