From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xry111@xry111.site>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043E63858403
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:28:11 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 043E63858403
Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest
 SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
 by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74B9266966;
 Mon, 25 Jul 2022 04:28:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <c888d01be9e1d0ee666e2b20b6afc11e111eb25d.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/13] GLIBC LoongArch PATCHES
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>, WANG Xuerui <i.swmail@xen0n.name>, 
 adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, 
 joseph_myers@mentor.com, carlos@redhat.com
Cc: liuzhensong@loongson.cn
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 16:28:05 +0800
In-Reply-To: <6339e6bd-94a2-4d4a-069a-c332a48bd241@loongson.cn>
References: <20220719012056.1461897-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
 <badd1aaa-cd4f-df7f-a764-7ebf36ec8855@xen0n.name>
 <71ad82b8b669d4233b7fd4741add7b58bd7ac20e.camel@xry111.site>
 <2ff6d3b4-36d2-c7cc-e1b1-119a93ec5423@xen0n.name>
 <6339e6bd-94a2-4d4a-069a-c332a48bd241@loongson.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.3 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS,
 DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD,
 LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 08:28:12 -0000

On Mon, 2022-07-25 at 16:21 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> Summary of test results:
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 1 FAIL
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 4576 PASS
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 22 UNSUPPORTED
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 12 XFAIL
> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 6 XPASS
> Overall this is looking good. Thanks for your testing.
>=20
>=20
> So, is it necessary to release another version of v8??

I guess a v8 is better because the 17th patch (NEWS) needs a rebase
anyway.  But let's wait for Adhemerval's suggestion...

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University