From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from srv.colino.net (srv.colino.net [212.83.157.151]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22AA93858410 for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:21:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 22AA93858410 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=colino.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=colino.net MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=colino.net; s=dkim; t=1689949258; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0RI22yS5wbaCufRU5leavTGxKXApMvt05IyPhmynD50=; b=uP16dBiWXVJt0YXq0m6OATItXReeFhY2mS+KXJvKS3hBFD4PKF7QIFq8yZ49JReG0+8BrD 0amLaNUzO9k7JlYyb6J1BrYQtE1T0SVlTSkLR7h5i6cZvQGwYgqjHv6dZvImC9/X1A6/q9 hi3T1IQyPMG8fa2aGz9CGK46/5Cs/eQ= Authentication-Results: srv.colino.net; auth=pass smtp.mailfrom=colin@colino.net Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2023 14:20:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "Colin Leroy-Mira" Message-ID: TLS-Required: No Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] localedata: Translit common emojis to smileys [BZ #30649] To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <859ffd6b-7a35-ff9b-f833-78a35456766a@linaro.org> References: <859ffd6b-7a35-ff9b-f833-78a35456766a@linaro.org> <20230721065203.3268784-1-colin@colino.net> <00a98f21d5db91e9e67f4b0b5a59f7cc9fd82feb@colino.net> X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: July 21, 2023 at 4:04 PM, "Adhemerval Zanella Netto" wrote: Hi again, > I am not sure, but it could this indeed. In any case I would recommend = you to > remove the comments, it is not clear the would be correctly displayed i= n all > environments and it can confusing. > Could you resend another version without the comment? That was it :)=20 Also=20I've been able to automatically mark the very first send of that patch "Superseded" using in-reply-to. Sadly I failed setting in-reply-to in the second sending, so it has not been marked Superseded by this last = send. I hope that's not going to be an annoyance to Patchwork reviewers and=20 I'm=20sorry for the mess-ups! I'll do better as I learn the system. Thanks, --=20 Colin