From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 107593 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2018 12:22:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 107512 invoked by uid 89); 14 Mar 2018 12:22:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] Use SCANF_LDBL_IS_DBL instead of __ldbl_is_dbl. To: Zack Weinberg , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20180307193205.4751-1-zackw@panix.com> <20180307193205.4751-5-zackw@panix.com> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180307193205.4751-5-zackw@panix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00332.txt.bz2 On 03/07/2018 08:32 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: > Change the callers of __vfscanf_internal and __vfwscanf_internal that > want to treat 'long double' as another name for 'double' (all of which > happen to be in sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt/nldbl-compat.c) to communicate > this via the new flags argument, instead of the per-thread variable > __no_long_double and its __ldbl_is_dbl wrapper macro. Patch looks okay to me. Thanks, Florian