From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from esa3.mentor.iphmx.com (esa3.mentor.iphmx.com [68.232.137.180]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9113858D20 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:31:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org EC9113858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codesourcery.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mentor.com X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,214,1688457600"; d="scan'208";a="15737634" Received: from orw-gwy-02-in.mentorg.com ([192.94.38.167]) by esa3.mentor.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2023 09:31:20 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 1jVXzqbE2ClwQDSER7KSjlirOWcE2xhv3wtfQ46snu5zxENiW5JT11wDqpbxGd+gC5pB2stSad t38slv4DrE+10SmTBgbOcKZSkR7vKVxVC3nQ694G9/26rGmM2+JB+TZ2DLzinNIJml3fqPhAjB 1qxEpv7OpDZ79XJBITqRSfveucTx5Pm2kkH8wdX3YTBDsljT8Z5fTuAco07wXcYxc6g3SUKZC+ S54VZwMi35Yw9wh83ByC00X4MbnHJMbIoC58az9vkdk9kKtNJFTzgJ7gvOe5SpA0f66zpPVd0H 5Sk= Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:31:13 +0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Alexandre Oliva CC: Carlos O'Donell , "Ryan S. Arnold" , Paul Eggert , Maxim Kuvyrkov , Jakub Jelinek , Andreas Schwab , libc-alpha Subject: Re: [Action Required] glibc decision to use CTI services. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Originating-IP: [137.202.0.90] X-ClientProxiedBy: svr-ies-mbx-12.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.12) To svr-ies-mbx-10.mgc.mentorg.com (139.181.222.10) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3104.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Wed, 30 Aug 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > Even then, this would IMHO be a move for GNU to decide, or at the very > least be consulted on, according to its own values and priorities, > something that all mantainers appointed by GNU, myself included, > committed ourselves to observe, prioritize and uphold as maintainers of > GNU packages. I encourage other maintainers to justify their responses > based on GNU's values and priorities, as they understand them. I believe the LF has already agreed to implement the hosting entirely with free software. Naturally we should make sure that other requirements from https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria.en.html such as "Does not discriminate against classes of users, or against any country. (C2)" and "Permits access via Tor (we consider this an important site function). (C3)" are met, though I don't expect problems there. Several criteria are trivally met or inapplicable simply because they concern things that are beyond the scope of this proposed hosting (for example, recommending particular choices of license, or offering choices of license, is entirely outside the scope of what these hosting facilities do, just as it's outside the scope of what Sourceware does - those are criteria for general-purpose hosting sites that anyone might add a package to). -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com