From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.68]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 837B0398545A for ; Sat, 9 Jan 2021 01:24:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 837B0398545A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cs.ucla.edu Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=eggert@cs.ucla.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016EC1600CD; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 40kNR0Vg38PF; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7011600F1; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ADJUNvKOoBJx; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (cpe-23-243-218-95.socal.res.rr.com [23.243.218.95]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20FB11600CD; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:15 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] stdlib: Sync canonicalize with gnulib [BZ #10635] [BZ #26592] [BZ #26341] [BZ #24970] To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20201229193454.34558-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <20201229193454.34558-5-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <502b6d2d-1139-ca9d-14cf-00082adc915e@linaro.org> <275283e0-70ee-5ea4-e63d-d0f1d1393667@cs.ucla.edu> <35be46d6-1b5a-b1f9-c3db-0956448c55ae@linaro.org> From: Paul Eggert Organization: UCLA Computer Science Department Message-ID: Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 17:24:14 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <35be46d6-1b5a-b1f9-c3db-0956448c55ae@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2021 01:24:17 -0000 On 1/4/21 4:52 AM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > The extra comparison might avoid the scratch_buffer resize that will > fail (since malloc will fail to try allocate PTRDIFF_MAX object), but > it will be used only when such objects are provided (which depending > of the system should not happen). As you say, that comparison isn't needed for glibc. It's also not needed on non-glibc because Gnulib prevents malloc etc. from succeeding on sizes greater than PTRDIFF_MAX. So we should be OK here.