public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] nss: Enhance tst-reload1 coverage and logging
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 09:33:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d24da9a1-5d6a-32d6-3cd2-f9954cb33222@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e287934ef500ec39ac8610dde04f2ea4a9d4010.1663931559.git.fweimer@redhat.com>



On 2022-09-23 07:13, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> ---
>   nss/tst-reload1.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

LGTM.

Reviewed-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>

> 
> diff --git a/nss/tst-reload1.c b/nss/tst-reload1.c
> index fdc5bdd65b..9cc6115c96 100644
> --- a/nss/tst-reload1.c
> +++ b/nss/tst-reload1.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>         TEST_VERIFY (p != NULL);
>         if (p != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (p->pw_name, pt[i].pw_name) == 0);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (p->pw_name, pt[i].pw_name);
>   	}
>       }
>   
> @@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>         TEST_VERIFY (p != NULL);
>         if (p != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (p->pw_name, pt[i].pw_name) == 0);
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (p->pw_uid == pt[i].pw_uid);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (p->pw_name, pt[i].pw_name);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (p->pw_uid, pt[i].pw_uid);
>   	}
>       }
>     endpwent ();
> @@ -144,10 +144,12 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>         TEST_VERIFY (h != NULL);
>         if (h != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (h->h_name, ht[i].h_name) == 0);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (h->h_name, ht[i].h_name);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (h->h_addrtype, AF_INET);
>   	  TEST_VERIFY (h->h_addr_list[0] != NULL);
> -	  if (h->h_addr_list[0])
> -	    TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (h->h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_addr_list[0]) == 0);
> +	  if (h->h_addr_list[0] != NULL)
> +	    TEST_COMPARE_BLOB (h->h_addr_list[0], h->h_length,
> +			       ht[i].h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_length);
>   	}
>       }
>   
> @@ -158,14 +160,16 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>         int herrno, res;
>   
>         res = gethostbyname2_r (ht[i].h_name, AF_INET,
> -			    &r, buf, TESTBUFLEN, &rp, &herrno);
> -      TEST_VERIFY (res == 0);
> +			      &r, buf, TESTBUFLEN, &rp, &herrno);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (res, 0);
>         if (res == 0)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (r.h_name, ht[i].h_name) == 0);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (r.h_name, ht[i].h_name);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (r.h_addrtype, AF_INET);
>   	  TEST_VERIFY (r.h_addr_list[0] != NULL);
> -	  if (r.h_addr_list[0])
> -	    TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (r.h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_addr_list[0]) == 0);
> +	  if (r.h_addr_list[0] != NULL)
> +	    TEST_COMPARE_BLOB (r.h_addr_list[0], r.h_length,
> +			       ht[i].h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_length);
>   	}
>       }
>   
> @@ -175,10 +179,11 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>         TEST_VERIFY (h != NULL);
>         if (h != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (h->h_name, ht[i].h_name) == 0);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (h->h_name, ht[i].h_name);
>   	  TEST_VERIFY (h->h_addr_list[0] != NULL);
> -	  if (h->h_addr_list[0])
> -	    TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (h->h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_addr_list[0]) == 0);
> +	  if (h->h_addr_list[0] != NULL)
> +	    TEST_COMPARE_BLOB (h->h_addr_list[0], h->h_length,
> +			       ht[i].h_addr_list[0], ht[i].h_length);
>   	}
>       }
>   
> @@ -198,17 +203,19 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>   
>         ap = NULL;
>         res = getaddrinfo (ht[i].h_name, NULL, &hint, &ap);
> -      TEST_VERIFY (res == 0);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (res, 0);
>         TEST_VERIFY (ap != NULL);
>         if (res == 0 && ap != NULL)
>   	{
>   	  j = 0; /* which address in the list */
>   	  while (ap)
>   	    {
> +	      TEST_COMPARE (ap->ai_family, AF_INET);
> +
>   	      struct sockaddr_in *in = (struct sockaddr_in *)ap->ai_addr;
>   	      unsigned char *up = (unsigned char *)&in->sin_addr;
>   
> -	      TEST_VERIFY (memcmp (up, ht[i].h_addr_list[j], 4) == 0);
> +	      TEST_COMPARE_BLOB (up, 4, ht[i].h_addr_list[j], 4);
>   
>   	      ap = ap->ai_next;
>   	      ++j;
> @@ -233,7 +240,7 @@ must_be_tests (struct passwd *pt, struct hostent *ht)
>   			 host_buf, sizeof(host_buf),
>   			 NULL, 0, NI_NOFQDN);
>   
> -      TEST_VERIFY (res == 0);
> +      TEST_COMPARE (res, 0);
>         if (res == 0)
>   	TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (ht[i].h_name, host_buf) == 0);
>         else
> @@ -285,8 +292,8 @@ test_cross_switch_consistency (void)
>         TEST_VERIFY (p != NULL);
>         if (p != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (p->pw_name, pwd_table_1[i].pw_name) == 0);
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (p->pw_uid == pwd_table_1[i].pw_uid);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (p->pw_name, pwd_table_1[i].pw_name);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (p->pw_uid, pwd_table_1[i].pw_uid);
>   	}
>   
>         /* After the first lookup, switch to conf2 and verify */
> @@ -296,7 +303,7 @@ test_cross_switch_consistency (void)
>   	  xrename ("/etc/nsswitch.conf2", "/etc/nsswitch.conf");
>   
>   	  p = getpwnam (pwd_table_2[0].pw_name);
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (p->pw_uid == pwd_table_2[0].pw_uid);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (p->pw_uid, pwd_table_2[0].pw_uid);
>   	}
>   
>         /* But the original loop should still be on conf1.  */
> @@ -311,8 +318,8 @@ test_cross_switch_consistency (void)
>         TEST_VERIFY (p != NULL);
>         if (p != NULL)
>   	{
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (p->pw_name, pwd_table_2[i].pw_name) == 0);
> -	  TEST_VERIFY (p->pw_uid == pwd_table_2[i].pw_uid);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE_STRING (p->pw_name, pwd_table_2[i].pw_name);
> +	  TEST_COMPARE (p->pw_uid, pwd_table_2[i].pw_uid);
>   	}
>       }
>     endpwent ();
> 
> base-commit: 774d43f27dbc730ee4b8b37bce4d5b3d5c0b74b6

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-23 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-23 11:13 Florian Weimer
2022-09-23 11:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] nss: Use shared prefix in IPv4 address in tst-reload1 Florian Weimer
2022-09-23 13:34   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-09-23 13:33 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d24da9a1-5d6a-32d6-3cd2-f9954cb33222@gotplt.org \
    --to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).