From: Adhemerval Zanella Netto <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LoongArch: Add Syscall Assembly Implementation
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:40:21 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d32a838e-8887-3a62-498f-8e3f2d0b4882@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <715a25cdd0fb53c8948e0d782d2149a68a62cbb7.camel@xry111.site>
On 23/03/23 15:26, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-03-24 at 01:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote:
>> On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 21:43 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 21:34 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2023-03-23 at 14:12 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>>>> On Mär 23 2023, caiyinyu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Without this patch(objdump -d libc.so...):
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 00000000000dd45c <syscall>:
>>>>>> dd45c: 02fec063 addi.d $sp, $sp, -
>>>>>> 80(0xfb0)
>>>>>> dd460: 02c0606c addi.d $t0, $sp, 24(0x18)
>>>>>> dd464: 29c06065 st.d $a1, $sp, 24(0x18)
>>>>>> dd468: 29c08066 st.d $a2, $sp, 32(0x20)
>>>>>> dd46c: 29c0a067 st.d $a3, $sp, 40(0x28)
>>>>>> dd470: 29c0c068 st.d $a4, $sp, 48(0x30)
>>>>>> dd474: 29c0e069 st.d $a5, $sp, 56(0x38)
>>>>>> dd478: 29c1206b st.d $a7, $sp, 72(0x48)
>>>>>> dd47c: 29c1006a st.d $a6, $sp, 64(0x40)
>>>>>
>>>>> If the argument registers are call-clobbbered, why does the compiler
>>>>> need to save them?
>>>>
>>>> It seems triggered by va_start. If I don't use "..." and replace it
>>>> with "a0, a1, a2, ..., a5", and remove va_start ... va_end, the
>>>> compiled
>>>> code won't save registers.
>>>>
>>>> I'll try to investigate further.
>>>
>>> Similar to GCC PR100955.
>>
>> Nope, it's not PR100955. PR100955 is about AArch64 but syscall is
>> compiled to almost perfect assemble code on AArch64.
>
> I was wrong. AArch64 has a assembly syscall.
>
>> It looks like caused by the lack of [TARGET_SETUP_INCOMING_VARARGS][1]
>> in GCC config/loongarch. I'll try to add it...
>
> LoongArch has a TARGET_SETUP_INCOMING_VARARGS but it does not use the
> information from stdarg pass. I can fix it, but even with the fix GCC
> would still save 7 registers (now GCC trunk saves 9 registers, the fix
> would make some improvement but no much).
>
> And the issue seems not trivial to fix. On x86_64, all of GCC, Clang,
> and MSVC will save some registers if va_arg is used. I've not found any
> compiler which can avoid saving the va_arg GARs unnecessarily yet:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/n1YqWq9c9
>
> Now to me it seems a bad idea to use va_arg in syscall.c.
>
I think it was the natural way to express kernel communication mechanism
that indeed takes variadic arguments. And since it is older than Linux
(man-pages stated it was from 4BSD), it also mean that you don't bind a
maximum limit or arguments (although on Linux and BSD does have a pratical
limit).
We can maybe add a implementation that uses named args (which extra
boilerplate to architectures that accepts 7 arguments instead of usual
6); and just enable it if a per-architecture flag is set meaning that
for that specific ABI the variadic is essentially the same as named
functions calls. Something like:
long int
syscall (long int number,
#if __ASSUME_SYSCALL_NAMED_WORKS
long int a0, long int a1, long int a2,
long int a3, long int a4, long int a5
#else
...
#endif
)
{
#ifndef __ASSUME_SYSCALL_NAMED_WORKS
va_list args;
va_start (args, number);
long int a0 = va_arg (args, long int);
long int a1 = va_arg (args, long int);
long int a2 = va_arg (args, long int);
long int a3 = va_arg (args, long int);
long int a4 = va_arg (args, long int);
long int a5 = va_arg (args, long int);
va_end (args);
#endif
long int r = INTERNAL_SYSCALL_NCS_CALL (number, a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5);
if (__glibc_unlikely (INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (r)))
{
__set_errno (-r);
return -1;
}
return r;
}
It might need some more hacks to hide the syscall prototype.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 8:40 caiyinyu
2023-03-23 9:25 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 12:01 ` caiyinyu
2023-03-23 13:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2023-03-23 13:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 13:43 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 17:34 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 18:26 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 18:40 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto [this message]
2023-03-23 19:08 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 13:12 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-03-23 12:00 caiyinyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d32a838e-8887-3a62-498f-8e3f2d0b4882@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=caiyinyu@loongson.cn \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).