From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [89.208.246.23]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07E3B3856961 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:46:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 07E3B3856961 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 07E3B3856961 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=89.208.246.23 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699955213; cv=none; b=ILkF6POYw29GmlWBsVR/TUSdor4ziFtYvgSmiKPPTz28m6fvc3eBnLw8olzZ7CPR2lTlf5kT/N9z0bp3b1AKQAJRSeJhv5Zpe4qxCVE0YVpVfTEl5zPCYHS8JoEzDrLl7xuEcOcblcP4BQHWF7rxBA/tp6zWe9klOWErLlrnQmI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1699955213; c=relaxed/simple; bh=satinxlx0MAD+yis9bfpesgap/Kipwt793BTW81wdaY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version; b=CB6FrpnP58swBs0qyLSrNaxu1Bzy4h//JknCFesOYjmXvBUPP4rdsUS3SpB12JObaBzgnkTYHgm3ZSf2kQ4KtubF4HK+KQGUJjLquyWCQoWVHB9l+d4MfIRq6wxrDB8pIm/5PoqypnbwEd6+FpJSwGcrP/j4GAc1kDFAF9RDvc4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site; s=default; t=1699955206; bh=satinxlx0MAD+yis9bfpesgap/Kipwt793BTW81wdaY=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VBueanTJYrYcd14G9qi/23MRd4/ENc28NIPvSkbLnkOfu2wW8bUfj6KMzGRFItt/O FPZK6G3PQDSI+moLq/5mMrcyCGcB/8/PLABOaiw51SMGlnL7gFN4YZhNMGNXGhhREN ElwF7VG4CoZSuNSVnw8P7P6NKK+aNPCet4cyzJN8= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF0D66A03; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 04:46:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Several tst-robust* tests time out with recent Linux kernel From: Xi Ruoyao To: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:46:43 +0800 In-Reply-To: <4bda9f2e06512e375e045f9e72edb205104af19c.camel@xry111.site> References: <4bda9f2e06512e375e045f9e72edb205104af19c.camel@xry111.site> Autocrypt: addr=xry111@xry111.site; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=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 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, 2023-11-14 at 02:33 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > Hi, >=20 > With Linux 6.7.0-rc1, several tst-robust* tests time out on x86_64: >=20 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust1 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust3 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust4 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust6 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust7 > FAIL: nptl/tst-robust9 >=20 > This does not happen with Linux 6.6.0.=C2=A0 Do you have some clue about > it? Bisected to the kernel commit: commit 5694289ce183bc3336407a78c8c722a0b9208f9b (HEAD) Author: peterz@infradead.org Date: Thu Sep 21 12:45:08 2023 +0200 futex: Flag conversion =20 Futex has 3 sets of flags: =20 - legacy futex op bits - futex2 flags - internal flags =20 Add a few helpers to convert from the API flags into the internal flags. =20 Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Andr Almeida Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921105247.722140574@noisy.programm= ing.kicks-ass.net --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University