From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4DF3850215 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 07:15:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EB4DF3850215 Received: from localhost.localdomain (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site) by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDC1166849; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 03:15:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/13] GLIBC LoongArch PATCHES From: Xi Ruoyao To: caiyinyu , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Cc: adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org, joseph_myers@mentor.com Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 15:15:17 +0800 In-Reply-To: <7cbacfadd642bafc42076eb5b7455a0acb7c720f.camel@xry111.site> References: <20220708065255.2316410-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn> <7cbacfadd642bafc42076eb5b7455a0acb7c720f.camel@xry111.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, BODY_8BITS, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD, LIKELY_SPAM_FROM, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 07:15:24 -0000 Resend to fix Adhemerval's email address :(. On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 15:13 +0800, Xi Ruoyao via Libc-alpha wrote: > On Fri, 2022-07-08 at 14:52 +0800, caiyinyu wrote: >=20 > > binutils:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 > > https://github.com/loongson/binutils-gdb/tree/dev/new_reloc >=20 > There are too much changes in this branch.=C2=A0 Could you isolate a > minimal > binutils patch enough for eliminating R_LARCH_NONE and > R_LARCH_IRELATIVE > from .rela.plt, get it reviewed, and push it into GNU binutils repo?=C2= =A0 > I > don't think it's a good idea to make *GNU* libc depend on some > external > linker code which is not reviewed by GNU binutils developers. >=20 > And we need to do this ASAP: we already missed binutils 2.39 release > branch cut date [1] and if we don't move fast we'll miss glibc-2.36 > release date. >=20 > [1]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121567.html >=20 >=20 --=20 Xi Ruoyao School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University