From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oo1-xc36.google.com (mail-oo1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68A3A3858D35 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 16:30:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 68A3A3858D35 Received: by mail-oo1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id i10-20020a4aab0a000000b002fccf890d5fso1926691oon.5 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:30:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s/Ij/hpNdhSAPwXWqR9G2p3Msnbq4C/rEb/y6qiKzSc=; b=dRWqsnEJWeBtEcFQ+qp8gAo21HFDjWKU3xYFlST5IOT9FwrA+k9M3d9HLnnICKcQMd 96RtIQpi4a8quDPgq//Q/YoTR9QIYraL9bEc+fdlVOAExlXXxrXC1RubhS/GsIfG+FFn mVNRG89IZ1g2T2yZASVBcsF6qaY4UWpX/F79Ukg2QkOUuNqwlL6prsUc/BK36ZAezCUJ zvM1yMnOpCTmcdfNvdW60wTxMHvbM887hvy3GHHciEMs9I8kw7tZanMACfNVFKV/+Hrs CiI5x4peuo7RkDWr3JCOURDvl6EFVD0cFkjsee/i3HpCrLbIGR7YbH/ZvT3ZhvIVbD+s pPag== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RmhPs9KFiJDNbFN46YiyFiUtexl8kPcEQHkX5LgYN2yGwZpFQ YAYbEpvfUIPc6Mk/nLdnADU07A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7zBMPwPexdTtzzEOjtxL6EEsLuazbY+teVBb7Cb8yHV44BQaqQgYsj+APX/z9/6KFUkCAMg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:610:: with SMTP id e16mr17592921oow.69.1643905837726; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2804:431:c7ca:709a:22aa:9542:591f:6eb9? ([2804:431:c7ca:709a:22aa:9542:591f:6eb9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15sm22444890oil.13.2022.02.03.08.30.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 08:30:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 13:30:34 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Remove prelink support Content-Language: en-US To: Richard Purdie , Carlos O'Donell , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20220121172951.285848-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> <6756d321-a537-48f1-931c-c68a12dd2309@redhat.com> From: Adhemerval Zanella In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:30:39 -0000 On 03/02/2022 12:29, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:59 -0500, Carlos O'Donell wrote: >> On 1/21/22 12:29, Adhemerval Zanella via Libc-alpha wrote: >>> As discussed recently on maillist [1], prelink is deprecated in >>> practice: >> >> This goes in the right direction. >> >> I think we should review this for glibc 2.36. >> >> Leaving glibc 2.35 as the last release with prelink support. > > Can I confirm that by the above, you mean that prelink is almost certain to be > removed after 2.35 is released? > > Yocto Project has an LTS due soon and this does influence what we do there a > little which is why I'm asking specifically. > > I'm saddened but resigned to it, the sad reality is there aren't enough people > to maintain everything and the utility of prelink is now questionable. Yes, it it still my plan to remove prelink on 2.36 as indicated in 2.35 NEWS.