From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Jason Duerstock <jason.duerstock@gmail.com>,
James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: remove the "tile" architecture from glibc
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e1cb4fbc-d44a-aacd-fcad-35b4dea7e7ad@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcf2795c-f480-513b-797e-ae1af846043c@physik.fu-berlin.de>
On 01/02/2018 11:33, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 02/01/2018 02:24 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>> ia64 seems to be in a good shape with only two issues which requires further
>> investigation (nptl/tst-cancel21-static and stdlib/tst-makecontext3 and
>> for the later I think it is a long-standing issue).
>
> Sounds good :). Then I think I am mostly worried with sparc64. It has
> really lots of testsuite failures.
I will check sparcv9/sparc64 later today as well.
>
>> However the math tests seems to shows a lot of corner cases issues which
>> has been fixed in generic implementations. As I commented with Jason Duerstock,
>> John Paul Adrian, and James Clarke in a private thread I think easier solution
>
> You can just say Adrian :-).
>
>> for 2.28 is we remove the arch-specific faulty ia64 math implementation and
>> use the generic ones. If performance is an issue we reimplement and fixed
>> them if it is the case.
>
> Do you think you could whip up a patch that we can apply to the 2.26 package
> in Debian? If it's just a matter of disabling ia64-specific code, it shouldn't
> be too difficult, should it?
If it is a matter of code removal I think backport should not be difficult.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 21:34 Chris Metcalf
2017-12-01 21:41 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-01 21:57 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-01 22:11 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-01 22:30 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-01 22:41 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-02 15:15 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-04 11:10 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2017-12-04 11:28 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-04 18:03 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-04 18:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2017-12-04 18:55 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-04 18:14 ` Chris Metcalf
2017-12-04 18:36 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2017-12-04 17:53 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-04 18:47 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-04 19:02 ` Joseph Myers
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311732001.23883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
[not found] ` <38170271-e17f-0a7e-7dd2-06fa6ddfae62@physik.fu-berlin.de>
2018-02-01 13:34 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-01 13:50 ` Joseph Myers
2018-02-01 16:50 ` Adhemerval Zanella
[not found] ` <9f8b994a-7085-e263-dd1b-bea2def55fb0@linaro.org>
2018-02-01 13:24 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-01 13:33 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-02-01 13:37 ` Adhemerval Zanella [this message]
2018-02-01 13:45 ` Joseph Myers
2018-02-01 16:40 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-01 13:39 ` Joseph Myers
2018-02-01 17:21 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-02-01 17:52 ` Joseph Myers
2018-02-01 18:30 ` Joseph Myers
2018-02-14 18:13 ` Joseph Myers
2017-12-02 1:15 ` Chris Metcalf
2017-12-02 15:16 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2017-12-04 21:49 ` Chris Metcalf
2017-12-04 23:29 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-07 15:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-07 16:01 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-07 16:08 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-07 16:49 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-03-07 17:17 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-07 18:16 ` Helmut Grohne
2018-03-08 15:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-08 16:06 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-08 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-03-09 16:31 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-09 16:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2018-03-09 16:53 ` Joseph Myers
2018-03-08 17:14 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2018-03-08 23:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-12-02 3:24 ` Carlos O'Donell
2017-12-08 16:20 ` Chris Metcalf
2018-01-05 9:01 ` Henrik Grindal Bakken
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e1cb4fbc-d44a-aacd-fcad-35b4dea7e7ad@linaro.org \
--to=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=jason.duerstock@gmail.com \
--cc=jrtc27@jrtc27.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).