From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=gXoC=7B=xry111.site=xry111@sourceware.org>
Received: from xry111.site (xry111.site [IPv6:2001:470:683e::1])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C362B3858D33
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu,  9 Mar 2023 03:25:50 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C362B3858D33
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=xry111.site
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xry111.site
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xry111.site;
	s=default; t=1678332348;
	bh=y+/P/TSE94rO+ehJvoIglhWCT4/I71hDKiZHCli1rfM=;
	h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=U72ZPlmGgr68b198tx88hWwV3G5JeCySkdEhby7tygGhtSTkzGKtqc9Ut/NzwWHMF
	 l26FyDgBGHD+gTOV/ga+c/17z3DbPDKmu7IbeWzf/1GXWzzyjabJPl6LnQTTcWsbCR
	 nUNVyh7DTprw4s7GZWbhdZJJZDrtRSEFCtqtviLk=
Received: from [IPv6:240e:358:11a4:a00:dc73:854d:832e:6] (unknown [IPv6:240e:358:11a4:a00:dc73:854d:832e:6])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature ECDSA (P-384))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	(Authenticated sender: xry111@xry111.site)
	by xry111.site (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47DA6664B1;
	Wed,  8 Mar 2023 22:25:44 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <e47cd4b0b2053b7c0a850c9b7e89e66bf8e97970.camel@xry111.site>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix bug about glibc.cpu.hwcaps.
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
To: caiyinyu <caiyinyu@loongson.cn>, Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 11:25:40 +0800
In-Reply-To: <ce6fc262-f80e-a03d-4107-f629d234470c@loongson.cn>
References: <20230302023349.3194099-1-caiyinyu@loongson.cn>
	 <CAMe9rOocK8e3+fuygtuqcDyMb82pAYQMGnFonuwn9H0xjaAK3w@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b7348af4-547c-9239-adcb-40ba94ecd5a3@loongson.cn>
	 <f8c8267607f42f02d06493454a03d9f564c0265a.camel@xry111.site>
	 <092a02df-58c3-633d-e44f-56d32535f775@loongson.cn>
	 <CAFUsyfJiK5mcAiagGSopSeJAfwZepQu4M_gt9CdfigE+S_r5ig@mail.gmail.com>
	 <3398ea16-1e36-8c08-0041-f7a4a2193907@loongson.cn>
	 <CAFUsyfKTEzEWXwmK8PkKmVjzG-HXfLhpNuPkAPLK-i20-4Z-Zg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ce6fc262-f80e-a03d-4107-f629d234470c@loongson.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.4 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LIKELY_SPAM_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Thu, 2023-03-09 at 09:26 +0800, caiyinyu wrote:
> > It also doesn't have the BZ number in the commit message. In the future=
 please
> > wait for approval before pushing.

My bad.  I thought the "OK" from H. J. was a formal approval and gave
some wrong advice.

> >=20
> Ok. There are "Recorded in [BZ #30183]:" in the commit message and I=20
> will append it on
>=20
> the first line next time.
>=20
> I mistakenly thought HJ is ok with

--=20
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University