From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7304F3857038 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2022 20:56:51 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7304F3857038 Received: from mail-qt1-f200.google.com (mail-qt1-f200.google.com [209.85.160.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-235-ELiip9VoMTmdEgPORMGILg-1; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 16:56:50 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ELiip9VoMTmdEgPORMGILg-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f200.google.com with SMTP id cf20-20020a05622a401400b0031efad5abb9so7660435qtb.10 for ; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:references:to :from:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date :message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=kGe2Foxh/y4SyJGAfKy/+OyEplDk6F5Y70mmAoDgaek=; b=2vb6hlqNI+jybPrjS/I1fPgfljYQ8wFV0IdpT8YrbNvXC1hP2WaK5jEqHwqEFst493 Lk5Sug4dLSAPy4H+/5AI+/UBZxvoggCy9vh5gO3VQDZ6dzPn3oG1ROEBY1hs64BgWKzg qgt5Utqrbopr0qvXVKNYp5Ef+f/1CS9GqbJWYtP/9puJleYuLWESizIc9gyjOD+BQ9B1 THTl1n1sIdOa/VLkT/ettQOOVr7mBwpIY2tbzyVS6zMW8GkDZIKUTEGyJz7uXI1LB39A quP5z9WGz5SJocIMyVtv76q8PCWEKmZtRstsjKOjD+qtJ5elrd/LlTiW7nhyruRUSDn5 W8WQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0phW6k4FJJPFjT3d9b9Ex736GJnwdL2bCUwI2NFkbU7w2RxVGo RRy2ZlTHgg5f6uZWygro+C5flB8jmIe7BmuTEB0kkLIgqOY51U2eFzM42ZZ00I67w+uDqxD8J+5 wutS9RZLJelcvsQCACbLa X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:246a:b0:477:2a3b:8537 with SMTP id im10-20020a056214246a00b004772a3b8537mr17491468qvb.128.1659992209291; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6Fkrsjr8y82urvHVrIQpA4G4zuU/mO/vyEnSdrVLUOKjm+VF53+LIO52LP1ReRkaLTgSWTTQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:246a:b0:477:2a3b:8537 with SMTP id im10-20020a056214246a00b004772a3b8537mr17491464qvb.128.1659992209155; Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:56:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.241] (192-0-145-146.cpe.teksavvy.com. [192.0.145.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y17-20020a05620a25d100b006b627d42616sm9920116qko.35.2022.08.08.13.56.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 08 Aug 2022 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 16:56:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: Should we make DT_HASH dynamic section for glibc? From: Carlos O'Donell To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto , libc-alpha References: <8c6fbd40-a0c6-d84f-4e5a-10e7109ffc08@linaro.org> Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2022 20:56:55 -0000 On 8/8/22 16:40, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > We should ask the gABI to mark DT_HASH as optional. I've started that discussion. https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/th5919osPAQ -- Cheers, Carlos.