From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] debug: test for more required cacellation points (BZ# 29274)
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2022 21:41:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e57aa9b5-490d-dd7a-ea64-c3727cc4162f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220830135302.2750242-1-adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
On 8/30/22 09:53, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
> Generalize the test for cancellation point in __read_chk to also test
> the other fortified functions with required cancellation points.
>
> Since there is not easy way to force some syscalls to block (for
> instance pread) the test tests two modes: cancellation on blocked
> syscalls and early cancellation on pending request.
>
> Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and aarch64-linux-gnu.
>
> Co-authored-by: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Thanks for working through the details of what you were trying to test
with these patches. This version looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
> ---
> debug/Makefile | 6 +-
> debug/tst-chk-cancel.c | 263 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> debug/tst-read-chk-cancel.c | 50 -------
> 3 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 debug/tst-chk-cancel.c
> delete mode 100644 debug/tst-read-chk-cancel.c
>
> diff --git a/debug/Makefile b/debug/Makefile
> index 456b349c4d..99cdf3221b 100644
> --- a/debug/Makefile
> +++ b/debug/Makefile
> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ CPPFLAGS-tst-longjmp_chk2.c += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1
> CFLAGS-tst-longjmp_chk3.c += -fexceptions -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
> CPPFLAGS-tst-longjmp_chk3.c += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1
> CPPFLAGS-tst-realpath-chk.c += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> -CPPFLAGS-tst-read-chk-cancel.c += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
> +CPPFLAGS-tst-chk-cancel.c += -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
>
> # _FORTIFY_SOURCE tests.
> # Auto-generate tests for _FORTIFY_SOURCE for different levels, compilers and
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ tests += tst-ssp-1
> endif
>
> ifeq ($(have-thread-library), yes)
> -tests += tst-read-chk-cancel
> +tests += tst-chk-cancel
> endif
>
> ifeq (,$(CXX))
> @@ -248,4 +248,4 @@ $(objpfx)xtrace: xtrace.sh
> -e 's|@REPORT_BUGS_TO@|$(REPORT_BUGS_TO)|' $^ > $@.new \
> && rm -f $@ && mv $@.new $@ && chmod +x $@
>
> -$(objpfx)tst-read-chk-cancel: $(shared-thread-library)
> +$(objpfx)tst-chk-cancel: $(shared-thread-library)
> diff --git a/debug/tst-chk-cancel.c b/debug/tst-chk-cancel.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..5c6e22697f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/debug/tst-chk-cancel.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,263 @@
> +/* Test for required cancellation points in fortified functions (BZ #29274)
> + Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> + This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> + modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> + version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> +
> + The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
> + Lesser General Public License for more details.
> +
> + You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> + License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> + <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> +
> +#include <array_length.h>
> +#include <errno.h>
> +#include <poll.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <support/check.h>
> +#include <support/xthread.h>
> +#include <support/xunistd.h>
> +#include <sys/socket.h>
> +
> +/* Cleanup handling test. */
> +static int cl_called;
> +
> +static void
> +cl (void *arg)
> +{
> + ++cl_called;
> +}
> +
> +static int fds[2];
> +static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_read (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __read_chk because the buffer size
> + is known, but the read length is non-constant. */
> + char c;
> + if (read (fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_pread (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __pread_chk because the buffer size
> + is known, but the read length is non-constant. */
> + char c;
> + if (pread (fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n, 0) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_pread64 (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __pread64_chk because the buffer size
> + is known, but the read length is non-constant. */
> + char c;
> + if (pread64 (fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n, 0) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_poll (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __poll_chk because the pollfd size
> + is known, but the number of entries is non-constant. */
> + struct pollfd pfd = { fds[0], POLLIN, 0 };
> + if (poll (&pfd, (uintptr_t) n, -1) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_ppoll (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __ppoll_chk because the pollfd size
> + is known, but the number of entries is non-constant. */
> + struct pollfd pfd = { fds[0], POLLIN, 0 };
> + if (ppoll (&pfd, (uintptr_t) n, 0, 0) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_recv (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __ppoll_chk because the pollfd size
> + is known, but the number of entries is non-constant. */
> + char c;
> + if (recv (fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n, 0) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *
> +tf_recvfrom (void *n)
> +{
> + pthread_cleanup_push (cl, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + /* This call should be forwarded to __ppoll_chk because the pollfd size
> + is known, but the number of entries is non-constant. */
> + char c;
> + if (recvfrom (fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n, 0, NULL, NULL) != 1)
> + return (void *) -1L;
> +
> + pthread_cleanup_pop (0);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct cancel_tests
> +{
> + const char *name;
> + void *(*tf) (void *);
> + bool only_early;
> +#define ADD_TEST(name, early) { #name, tf_##name, early }
> +} tests[] =
> +{
> + ADD_TEST (poll, false),
> + ADD_TEST (ppoll, false),
> + ADD_TEST (pread, true),
> + ADD_TEST (pread64, true),
> + ADD_TEST (read, false),
> + ADD_TEST (recv, false),
> + ADD_TEST (recvfrom, false),
> +};
> +
> +/* Set the send buffer of socket S to 1 byte so any send operation
> + done with WRITE_BUFFER_SIZE bytes will force syscall blocking. */
> +static void
> +set_socket_buffer (int s)
> +{
> + int val = 1;
> + socklen_t len = sizeof (val);
> +
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (setsockopt (s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, &val,
> + sizeof (val)) == 0);
> + TEST_VERIFY_EXIT (getsockopt (s, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDBUF, &val, &len) == 0);
> + printf ("%s: got size %d\n", __func__, val);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +do_test (void)
> +{
> + xpthread_barrier_init (&barrier, 0, 2);
> +
> + if (socketpair (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, fds) != 0)
> + FAIL_EXIT1 ("socketpair: %m");
> + set_socket_buffer (fds[1]);
> +
> + /* This is the !only_early test. It is a late cancel test that has a sleep
> + in the main thread in an attempt to allow the child thread to reach and
> + block on the syscall. The cancellation should happen with high
> + probability when the child thread blocked on the syscall, and that is
> + the intent of the test (syscall cancellation registration complete). */
> + for (int i = 0; i < array_length (tests); i++)
> + {
> + if (tests[i].only_early)
> + continue;
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_init (&barrier, NULL, 2);
> + /* Reset the counter for the cleanup handler. */
> + cl_called = 0;
> +
> + pthread_t thr = xpthread_create (0, tests[i].tf, (void *) 1L);
> + /* After this wait the threads cancellation handler is installed. */
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = 0, .tv_nsec = 100000000 };
> + TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY (clock_nanosleep (CLOCK_REALTIME, 0, &ts, &ts));
> +
> + xpthread_cancel (thr);
> +
> + void *status = xpthread_join (thr);
> + TEST_VERIFY (status == PTHREAD_CANCELED);
> + TEST_COMPARE (cl_called, 1);
> +
> + printf ("in-time cancel test of '%s' successful\n", tests[i].name);
> + }
> +
> + /* This is a early cancel test that happens before the syscall is issued.
> + In this case there is no signal involved, pthread_cancel will just mark
> + the target thread canceled, since asynchronous mode is not set, and the
> + cancellable entrypoint will check if the thread is set as cancelled and
> + exit early.
OK. Agreed.
> +
> + Keep in mind that neither pthread_barrier_wait nor pthread_cleanup_push
> + act as cancellation entrypoints. */
OK. Correct! Great comment.
> + for (int i = 0; i < array_length (tests); i++)
> + {
> + xpthread_barrier_init (&barrier, NULL, 2);
> + /* Reset the counter for the cleanup handler. */
> + cl_called = 0;
> +
> + /* After this wait the cancellation handler is in place. */
> + pthread_t thr = xpthread_create (0, tests[i].tf, NULL);
> +
> + xpthread_cancel (thr);
> + xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> +
> + void *status = xpthread_join (thr);
> + TEST_VERIFY (status == PTHREAD_CANCELED);
> + TEST_COMPARE (cl_called, 1);
> +
> + printf ("early cancel test of '%s' successful\n", tests[i].name);
> + }
> +
> + xpthread_barrier_destroy (&barrier);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#include <support/test-driver.c>
> diff --git a/debug/tst-read-chk-cancel.c b/debug/tst-read-chk-cancel.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 7e06afb596..0000000000
> --- a/debug/tst-read-chk-cancel.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
> -/* Test that __read_chk is a cancellation point (BZ #29274)
> - Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> - This file is part of the GNU C Library.
> -
> - The GNU C Library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> - modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> - License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> - version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> -
> - The GNU C Library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> - but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> - MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
> - Lesser General Public License for more details.
> -
> - You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> - License along with the GNU C Library; if not, see
> - <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
> -
> -#include <stdint.h>
> -#include <support/xunistd.h>
> -#include <support/xthread.h>
> -
> -static int pipe_fds[2];
> -static pthread_barrier_t barrier;
> -
> -static void *
> -read_thread (void *n)
> -{
> - xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> - char c;
> - /* This call should be forwarded to __read_chk because the buffer size
> - is known, but the read length is non-constant. */
> - if (read (pipe_fds[0], &c, (uintptr_t) n) != 1)
> - return (void *) -1L;
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int
> -do_test (void)
> -{
> - xpthread_barrier_init (&barrier, 0, 2);
> - xpipe (pipe_fds);
> - pthread_t thr = xpthread_create (0, read_thread, (void *) 1L);
> - xpthread_barrier_wait (&barrier);
> - xpthread_cancel (thr);
> - xpthread_join (thr);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -#include <support/test-driver.c>
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-30 13:53 Adhemerval Zanella
2022-09-05 1:41 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e57aa9b5-490d-dd7a-ea64-c3727cc4162f@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).