From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1752 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2017 14:57:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1699 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2017 14:57:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:421 X-HELO: homiemail-a52.g.dreamhost.com Subject: Re: libc-2.25.90.pot To: Adhemerval Zanella , Benno Schulenberg , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Paul Eggert References: <8b9b4e60-f580-e56a-26bc-adb7192ba779@sourceware.org> <6e7f7602-3536-2edb-0cf4-e66a948fdb71@translationproject.org> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:57:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00745.txt.bz2 On Thursday 20 July 2017 06:22 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > I would not say future-proof, but rather the macro is to allow more > compatibility for different libc implementation (for the case where the > libc is c99 compatible but not support %jd). Oh I meant PRIdLINENO, not PRIdMAX. I suppose using PRIdMAX directly might work since gettext seems to recognize the other PRI* macros. Siddhesh