From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 108302 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2017 12:52:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 108288 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jul 2017 12:52:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:1081, interest, hear, tomorrow X-HELO: mail-qt0-f180.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y6+FBSGpldwABuThDN18NL25zIoeGZPvLYMxW1yRTFg=; b=IKCD2yiWGNEZxR9wvjcpV4Sxv5Tus2lBewjsiZNNTzY4DfF/aby5TEMrptulrh8oOD oJRhdpGck6D4Y0AsRVxWRTHYjWK/wBNjaIsLn/h1qU8O1PdL5YjOQhzARwDFGIunyGM2 qG+Qpz3doH289uRTZLdkEPeP5PYXciCZkfHd3cXphINTkDRjx7ayxLqa+yJAIBSFxVcU gFe7l5mQNeLrm7sSQU98mviYqRuYEaZooZ73Qrv+ZOGhBo12cOubFOFMwIh8zoZpuvJw 78zXdg/MzU7z2yqjo+k1m7qSVVD+KNcCE4s6/8gxuWfTzyGsx1QSGxEHd3f4j1eoU2uk egRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112xSGimEkBFUm322wk6jzm2mzR0UGtycILue8+2M6u1RqcBT/pV PT9sxvjHrBTgZe5NW38VqA== X-Received: by 10.233.239.11 with SMTP id d11mr4316063qkg.266.1500555125662; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 05:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: libc-2.25.90.pot To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , Benno Schulenberg , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Paul Eggert References: <8b9b4e60-f580-e56a-26bc-adb7192ba779@sourceware.org> <6e7f7602-3536-2edb-0cf4-e66a948fdb71@translationproject.org> From: Adhemerval Zanella Message-ID: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:52:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00740.txt.bz2 On 20/07/2017 08:17, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wednesday 19 July 2017 07:19 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> On Wednesday 19 July 2017 06:58 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote: >>> I think for glibc, since we support C99 intmax_t printf format, we can >>> just use %jd instead: >>> >>> * timezone/zic.c (PRIdLINENO): Remove macro. >>> (verror): Use %jd instead of PRIdLINENO. >> >> Fine with me, but I'd like to hear from Joseph/Paul too if they have any >> context from the tz project that may make this a bad idea. > > In the interest of unblocking the translation team, lets wait till > tomorrow and then commit if there are no objections. The more I look at > the change the more it looks like future-proofing and not relevant to a > current problem. If the future-proofing is necessary, we can get it > back in 2.26.90 in a way that does not break translation strings. I would not say future-proof, but rather the macro is to allow more compatibility for different libc implementation (for the case where the libc is c99 compatible but not support %jd).