From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>, libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: --enable-stack-protector for glibc, v10
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb7eedc3-c0c2-219e-75c7-afe07420f605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161219111528.14969-1-nix@esperi.org.uk>
On 12/19/2016 12:15 PM, Nix wrote:
> Here, as promised, is version 10 of the stack-protected glibc patch,
> incorporating all review comments to date (unless I missed some).
I will start committing patches from this series shortly.
There are some open questions (more on that later), but I think the
overall design is sound, and it will simplify matters if we reduce the
size of the series somewhat.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-20 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-19 11:15 Nix
2016-12-19 11:15 ` [PATCH 06/15] Prevent the rtld mapfile computation from dragging in __stack_chk_fail* Nix
2016-12-19 11:15 ` [PATCH 04/15] Mark all machinery needed in early static-link init as -fno-stack-protector Nix
2016-12-21 14:18 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-19 11:15 ` [PATCH 08/15] Add a hidden __stack_chk_fail_local alias to libc.so Nix
2016-12-19 11:25 ` [PATCH 14/15] tst-quad1pie, tst-quad2pie: compile with -fPIE Nix
2016-12-21 13:36 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-19 11:25 ` [PATCH 09/15] De-PLTize __stack_chk_fail internal calls within libc.so Nix
2016-12-21 15:05 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-22 22:41 ` Nix
2016-12-19 11:25 ` [PATCH 10/15] Link a non-libc-using test with -fno-stack-protector Nix
2016-12-19 11:25 ` [PATCH 11/15] Drop explicit stack-protection of pieces of the system Nix
2016-12-19 11:25 ` [PATCH 15/15] Enable -fstack-protector=* when requested by configure Nix
2016-12-19 11:26 ` [PATCH 13/15] Move all tests out of csu Nix
2016-12-21 13:36 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-19 11:26 ` [PATCH 01/15] Configury support for --enable-stack-protector Nix
2016-12-19 11:26 ` [PATCH 12/15] Do not stack-protect sigreturn stubs Nix
2016-12-19 11:26 ` [PATCH 05/15] Compile the entire dynamic linker with -fno-stack-protector Nix
2016-12-21 14:18 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-21 14:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2016-12-21 14:57 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-19 11:26 ` [PATCH 02/15] Initialize the stack guard earlier when linking statically Nix
2016-12-21 14:16 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-21 20:15 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-22 22:38 ` Nix
2016-12-19 11:27 ` [PATCH 07/15] Work even with compilers hacked to enable -fstack-protector by default Nix
2016-12-19 11:27 ` [PATCH 03/15] Do not stack-protect ifunc resolvers Nix
2016-12-21 14:17 ` Florian Weimer
2016-12-22 22:40 ` Nix
2016-12-19 15:15 ` --enable-stack-protector for glibc, v10 Florian Weimer
2016-12-19 15:18 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-12-19 15:54 ` Nix
2016-12-20 8:30 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2016-12-20 19:04 ` Nix
2016-12-21 17:26 ` Florian Weimer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eb7eedc3-c0c2-219e-75c7-afe07420f605@redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=nix@esperi.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).