Re: [STATS] Auto-update patchwork for committed patches

[Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>]

On 2023-05-17 13:14, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Siddhesh Poyarekar, le mer. 17 mai 2023 11:30:37 -0400, a ecrit:
>> 4571fb8fe64644c79d91a8f76c148a05b7088ea8 Update hurd/intr-msg.c to be more
>> portable: MISSING
>> 3f433cb895dee51dee57cb487bc33b1425fa7ef6 Update sysdeps/mach/hurd/ioctl.c to
>> make it more portable: MISSING
>> a26238d3ca21fda6d7d41b4d56541fcf4546fbe7 Enable new device_open_new RPC in
>> libmachuser.: MISSING
>> 3ca9f43d1007956251130ee5a59abb63bff8a6b6 Stop checking if MiG supports
>> retcode.: MISSING
>> 114f1b7881e63e2b4e5d0e9a9e4fb142b9cd886c hurd: Fix computing user stack
>> pointer: MISSING
>> e333759f7752593a69a8f9920a247ed3878fafef hurd: Fix sc_i386_thread_state
>> layout: MISSING
>> ce96593c882b393461084048533120e9c1e9d328 hurd: Align signal stack pointer
>> after allocating stackframe: MISSING
>> ff0f87632a74a369a2b992f4436ae406065a4012 hurd: Fix aligning signal stack
>> pointer: MISSING
> 
> I don't remember changing anything in those?
> 
> For instance
> 
>> 4571fb8fe64644c79d91a8f76c148a05b7088ea8 Update hurd/intr-msg.c to be more
>> portable: MISSING
> reached the mailing list on
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-May/147836.html
> 
> or perhaps since I had already marked the patch as commited and
> archived, your script didn't find it?

Ah! not because you marked it committed, but because you archived it :) 
Please don't bother archiving it; archival is only for unresolved 
patches that become stale.

Thanks for letting me know though; it's great that our success rate is 
actually much higher then :)

>> d6c72f976c61d3c1465699f2bcad77e62bafe61d hurd: rule out some mach headers
>> when generating errno.h: MISSING
> 
> I probably forgot to send the mail for this one, now done.

Great, the script won't mark this anymore since it's already 
fast-forwarded to current master, but thanks for doing it anyway :)

Thanks,
Sid