From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897E03857C70 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:08:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 897E03857C70 Received: from mail-qv1-f71.google.com (mail-qv1-f71.google.com [209.85.219.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-324-dcg4SKRpMJ6ZIuSJ9VSw_Q-1; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 08:08:47 -0500 X-MC-Unique: dcg4SKRpMJ6ZIuSJ9VSw_Q-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f71.google.com with SMTP id q37so13754416qvf.14 for ; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 05:08:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B4OgR3vU2iI6jSGG4XjdhirjL5PvEZFxH2S+WMJWRCI=; b=BWD0j+4qGydL56+20FkJSEo3xSmi2WeuTOAVXICsZiJQHHLCx814fu+FWkbjvv+Tzz nY2CgS0jH3YNO5IiB7jfXp2cVUlX7op2gPHy5/o+9F5EQTTiAxuoDzzw1y8xq3l/+DEt IxOmAyKM+7lTChVc3SsfzVE77Qi3RSWxtXHCd22Z68ejAD3JZfw+TvaYeTyR1r4nx0Kc N5p4j7U7etKNxVXFEUiq6vKDh+XS9psF/AGpurGP5U3u3zxZpE6+30oOGjx7PvP38rrS c4YATJfp797y9RAUsKBZYm9FNyrRW+/5qvlfeS4o4LUbeXF9cjxyjUafFvCMkgO//1Nl t4tQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z8mow1q+oFIDPUd3JPV5vrLVB9msU9tfa0qZbbSeGe5vyhto6 aILd25AspDoSAIVYKXIQuFoLaSkrpce+bZZkRURkgsB2R/S4j6Xh735yeQONnJ2on9NfS7itvpv c8trtWuBwcb9AzL0n+gsJ X-Received: by 2002:ac8:718f:: with SMTP id w15mr19697105qto.179.1612271327168; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 05:08:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx18Z1yq3osqAT1cFqZ3lhtD6UlPymOxUYTmqxCI9QBYwvZxrSTFaH6H4Hi1H1wV/xAdiSbsw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:718f:: with SMTP id w15mr19697088qto.179.1612271326915; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 05:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (198-84-214-74.cpe.teksavvy.com. [198.84.214.74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l24sm4948424qtj.50.2021.02.02.05.08.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 05:08:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: V10 [PATCH] sysconf: Add _SC_MINSIGSTKSZ/_SC_SIGSTKSZ [BZ #20305] To: Florian Weimer , Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha Cc: "H.J. Lu" , Florian Weimer , Dave Martin , Joseph Myers References: <20201104165018.GE6882@arm.com> <87lfeyvghf.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20201118170434.GF6882@arm.com> <873616va9n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <20201118180927.GI6882@arm.com> <87tutkjexc.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <74ee50ef-948f-b9e7-2525-9cf4ec35b754@redhat.com> <87h7n5hzks.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:08:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h7n5hzks.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 13:08:50 -0000 On 1/25/21 9:16 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha: > >> We document _SC_SIGSTKSZ_SOURCE as the way to request this change. > > I have previously objected to _SC_SIGSTKSZ_SOURCE. I still it's wrong. > We haven't done anything like that in a long time. All other recent > features have been enabled by _GNU_SOURCE, even world-breaking ones, > like the math TS macros and functions. I didn't see your objection during my review of the patch. Thank you for stating it again. I purposely moved this patch out of glibc 2.33 so we could have more time to use this before the release. Do you have a pointer to your original objection with notes about why you object? -- Cheers, Carlos.