From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-109715-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1602 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2020 21:00:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 128413 invoked by uid 89); 13 Feb 2020 21:00:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,FREEMAIL_FROM,GARBLED_BODY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=H*MI:@protonmail.com, H*MI:sk:y3k845Z, H*MI:sk:8736bet, H*MI:sk:87zhdms
X-HELO: mail-40130.protonmail.ch
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:00:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com;
	s=default; t=1581627647;
	bh=tvhVQDJriVDbT0haXe6Y9JyZYORjQpXS6sMDCrM6qBU=;
	h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Feedback-ID:From;
	b=rNXSlHnDAk6Szz9s0lz/e8b6pqM9t9yzJ2EO1nxX1qKZChk55cx05rhUnTfamFgBa
	 rYzqiAC40C3pnPFewf8gCQFS7nRbNZO5WgbWt29Y1yMU9/byBGNAKRCAV4uEeX0q7S
	 eEDpGqC3C4xRrmihVo9Tu0fl7l2ghXf8FbKfxwBU=
To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@ascii.art.br>
From: GT <tnggil@protonmail.com>
Cc: "libc-alpha@sourceware.org" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, "tnggil@protonmail.com" <tnggil@protonmail.com>
Reply-To: GT <tnggil@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] PPC64: Attach SIMD attribute to cosf, sin, sinf function declarations.
Message-ID: <eucPEm0CTf8tusq8dkVVJS7GWTfCI8J2SXGRSPVkRZti_i6QzH89ZLr4MTq5wenMZ3YL0b-Jb-on44imlCjZo0gazPfbXIUHT3hf_N3Ol6c=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <87zhdms0jr.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
References: <DvwHcak5KwVvbzMv_WCM7H9nJszCKQQ4SdW02ubyAj4LgcjJqDglQd8h9nDtibqBr1GO5JXfAfQJaWaHBS8FTGcz8d8Yu7pjFgLgszxBhvI=@protonmail.com>
 <8736bethj7.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
 <y3k845Zx_Nv75DVXPhcJ1loMnGNoXUtATjMouy6MVdKQ8XcuUz17_e_tR5XzRZqPmLqEMMqqJzPnaGVtf0X4-2a2dNTuwVpnWq4tIYNnSyE=@protonmail.com>
 <87zhdms0jr.fsf@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00621.txt.bz2

=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me=
ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 3:19 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <t=
uliom@ascii.art.br> wrote:

> GT tnggil@protonmail.com writes:
>
> > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 2:26 PM, Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filh=
o tuliom@ascii.art.br wrote:
> > The commits whose abbreviated ids are c1782a410f, 1bd6ae3a5a, and 29d3a=
dfe09.
> > Each of them introduces a test to ensure that feature(s) used in immedi=
ately preceding
> > patches are available on the system.
>
> OK.
>
> > My understanding is that by using git rebase, each of those 3 commits c=
an be combined
> > with the earlier patch that should have had the feature tests initially=
. I am assuming that
> > it is ok to re-write history in branch tuliom/libmvec in this manner. I=
f not so, then you
> > may dismiss the suggestion.
>
> I don't think these changes are necessary.
>
> > I wanted to use the same order of defines/undefines as the math-vector.=
h for x86-64 at:
> > sysdeps/x86/fpu/bits/
>
> I also don't think these files need to be identical.
>
> The patch LGTM if it adds the missing declarations.
>

Can I let the patch remain as is? Or should I send a new version with
only the missing declarations added? Meaning the new patch will not
reorder existing lines in the header?

Bert.